Shamanism: The Discovery of Spirit and Body
Good Fit
- Readers curious about the religious-mythological roots of Turkic-Mongol and Siberian peoples
- Anyone who wants a quick sense of how scholars disagree on whether shamanism is a religion, an ecstatic technique, or an exchange principle
- Readers interested in the ethnographic answer to "how does someone become a shaman" (calling signs, illness, visions)
Not a Fit
- Specialists looking for a deep, source-heavy academic study of one specific region's shamanism (e.g. only Siberia or only the Altai) — this book is a broad, introductory-level synthesis
- Readers approaching shamanism through the lens of contemporary "neo-shamanism" or self-help practice — this book stays historical-ethnographic
- Academic readers expecting a heavy citation apparatus (footnotes, source comparison) — the book is written in a popular format
The author opens with three competing scholarly definitions of shamanism: Romanian historian of religion Mircea Eliade regards it as one of the oldest "techniques of ecstasy"; French anthropologist Roberte Hamayon instead grounds it in a spiritual bond between hunter and prey that later evolved into a broader system based on a "giving-and-receiving" principle.
A third view — from Soviet ethnologists (Ksenofontov, Potapov, Tokarev, Gumilev) — treats shamanism directly as a religion; the Yakut ethnologist Ksenofontov even calls it "the grandmother of Christianity." Presenting these three views side by side is the book's strongest move — it shows that shamanism resists a single tidy definition.
The author then turns to the shared Sky God belief found among Siberian and Central Asian peoples — known as "Nurm" among the Samoyeds, "Buga" among the Tungus, "Tengri" among the Mongols, "Tengeri" among the Buryats, "Töngere" among the Volga Tatars, and "Tangara" among the Yakuts — a concept Eliade considered near-universal across world cultures.
The "Shamans" chapter traces the word's etymology: it derives from Tungus, originally meaning "sorcerer/healer," but parallel terms exist in Yakut ("ojun"), Mongolian ("böğü"), and Turkic-Tatar ("kam"), with a possible link even noted to the Sanskrit "samana," meaning a Buddhist monk.
The book lays out three paths to becoming a shaman: divine, spontaneous selection; voluntary acceptance of an inherited calling; and hereditary transmission across generations. In all three, a candidate's distinguishing traits from childhood — a pull toward solitude, long walks, sometimes epileptic-seizure-like episodes — are interpreted as "encounters with the gods"; a quote from Nioradze describes this transition as accompanied by real physical and spiritual suffering.
The chapter closes with an account of the symbolic tools used to enter trance — a bell-adorned cap, tobacco, and especially the drum — which is described alternately as the vehicle that "carries" the shaman and as a symbolic object for communicating with spirits; the red, white, and black paint on it points to the sky-world and the earth-world respectively.
- The book belongs to the "Handbook for the Lazy Intellectual" series — deliberately short, dense, and designed to be read "in one sitting"
- The text cites academic sources (Eliade, Hamayon, Nioradze, Ksenofontov, etc.) but keeps the footnote/bibliographic apparatus minimal
- The tone is descriptive and comparative rather than statistical — it focuses on explaining terminological differences rather than presenting data
The classic academic work this book repeatedly cites — a deeper, fully scholarly source on the same subject
A well-known work approaching shamanic practice from a more practical, contemporary "neo-shamanism" perspective
After the Introduction and "Shamans" chapters, the book moves into shamanic creation mythology and the spiritual explanation of natural phenomena (lightning, wind, the seasons).
Later chapters explore the structural parallels between shamanic rituals and Alevi semah ceremonies, then examine specific shamanic symbols in Turkic mythology (such as the world tree, bird, and drum motifs), closing with a bibliography.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
