Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

100 Fake News Stories vs. Science

Alexandre Marsat, Alexandrine Civard-Racinais, Florence Heimburger, Clemence Gouy
Review by: Türkanə Əliyeva22 September 20261 min read
Written by the editor-in-chief of France's "Curieux!" media project, this light and witty popular-science book debunks 100 widespread scientific myths — from nutrition to outer space — using real research.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers who enjoy a "one or two myths per sitting" format and want scientific content delivered with a light tone
  • Anyone curious about the real research behind everyday claims like "a glass of wine a day is good for your health"
  • Newcomers to popular science — every chapter is short, jargon-free, and sourced
Not a Fit
  • Readers wanting an in-depth, academic-level exploration of any single topic — each myth gets just 1-2 pages, no deep analysis
  • Anyone looking for a book with one continuous narrative — this is a collection of independent short pieces readable in any order
How Readers Rate It
Scientific rigor 3.1/5 Average
Readability 4.4/5 Very easy
Topic range 4.6/5 Very broad
40 voters
The first 3 myths: Wine, Coffee, Alcohol during pregnancy
Covers the first 3 of the book's 100 chapters (pp. 11-15, ~3% of the book) — the opening of the "Nutrition" section.

The book opens with "A glass of wine a day is good for your health," examining the famous "French paradox" (French people having fewer heart problems than the British despite a similarly fatty diet). A 1992 theory by Serge Renaud and Michel de Lorgeril, published in The Lancet, claimed wine reduces heart disease by 40% — but the authors immediately counter with France's Public Health Agency finding that one alcoholic drink a day is linked to 7 different cancer types (mouth, throat, digestive tract, breast). Verdict: moderation is the key word, and the myth is neither fully false nor fully true.

The second chapter examines "Coffee should be avoided." A Southampton University meta-analysis covering 200 studies found that up to 4 cups a day (up to 400mg of caffeine) significantly reduces the risk of certain cancers, diabetes, and neurological diseases (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's). But caffeine also halts melatonin production for 6 hours — the book recommends avoiding coffee after 4-5pm if you want to sleep before 11pm.

The third chapter tackles one of the most sensitive topics: whether "just one small glass" of alcohol during pregnancy is truly harmless. The authors take a clear scientific stance — during the embryo's formation stage (the first three months), it's impossible to know in advance exactly WHEN alcohol will cause harm; the book calls it "a game of Russian roulette." An interesting added detail: recent research shows that a father's alcohol consumption before conception increases the unborn baby's risk of heart disease by 44% — the book addresses future fathers, not just mothers.

Reading Experience
  • Every chapter follows the same format: a claim → "Really?" → a research-based answer, often with a visual "for/against" table
  • Written collaboratively by 4 authors from Curieux!, a French science-communication team — each chapter ends with its individual author's byline
  • The tone stays light and witty, but every claim is backed by a specific study or journal citation (e.g. The Lancet)
If You Liked This
FactfulnessHans Rosling

A similarly structured popular-science book that debunks everyday misconceptions with statistics

100 Fake News Face à la Science 2Same authors

The sequel, same format

Spoiler
What other topics does the book cover?
⚠️ The general direction of the remaining sections is revealed here.

After Nutrition, the book moves to Memory & Brain (male/female brain differences, the "we only use 10% of our brain" myth), Math & Physics, and Climate Change & Environment (going vegan, planting trees).

The final sections cover Biodiversity (myths about cats, wolves, sharks) and Space (black holes, whether the Great Wall of China is visible from space, aliens) — each continuing the same "claim + scientific answer" format.

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
A practical guide that locates the root of depression not in personality but in relationships, turning the evidence-based Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) method into a 12-week self-help program, enriched with four vivid composite "client" stories.
4.0 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
Feeling Better

Feeling Better

Cindy Goodman Stulberg, Ronald J. Frey, Jennifer Dawson · Non-fiction
Reviews
A love story between the hockey stars of rival universities: fast, funny, with explicit sex scenes and a past trauma carried in the background. Its strongest points are the sharp dialogue of the two leads and the serious handling of sexism and the father-daughter bond. Its weaknesses are the heavily repeated «enemies-to-lovers» pattern, long side threads and an ending that is perhaps too happy.
3.6 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
Risk

Risk

Elle Kennedy · Novel
Reviews
The core book of the 'Montignac Method', which sold millions of copies in the 1980s and 1990s: it rejects calorie counting, attributes weight gain mainly to insulin spikes caused by 'bad carbohydrates', and proposes a two-phase diet built on the glycaemic index. Some of its ideas — the glycaemic index itself, avoiding sugar and white flour, favouring fibre — later found scientific support. But categorical claims such as 'counting calories is nonsense' and 'low-calorie diets make you fat' contradict what science knows about energy balance, and allowing wine and beer with every meal even during the weight-loss phase is debatable.
2.7 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
Eat Yourself Slim… and Stay Slim!

Eat Yourself Slim… and Stay Slim!

Michel Montignac · Non-fiction
Reviews
Hasan Alpay Karasoy's dictionary explaining intelligence and security terms in alphabetical order. In the first entries that were read, the strongest side is that each term is given with its English equivalent, definition, source and «See also» reference; entries such as types of agent and MICE are detailed and clear. The weak side is that the dictionary format is for lookup, not for reading in order, and some entries sound dry in academic language. A useful reference book for students of intelligence and security.
3.6 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
Intelligence and Security Dictionary

Intelligence and Security Dictionary

H. Alpay Karasoy · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text