Purple Cow
Good Fit
- Small business owners and solopreneurs
- Anyone with a tiny marketing budget but plenty of ideas
- Fans of short chapters — each one is 2–4 pages
- People who learn best from real examples
Not a Fit
- Readers expecting a step-by-step playbook — there's no ready-made recipe here
- Anyone looking for academic marketing theory
- Readers bothered by how dated the 2003 examples feel
- Anyone who gets irritated by repetition — the core idea is repeated many times
Godin starts with marketing's classic checklist. For decades the field has talked about the "P's" — elements that each start with P: product, price, promotion, positioning, publicity, packaging, permission. It's a handy checklist for auditing whether you're doing your job right. Godin doesn't dismiss it; he just says it's no longer enough. His logic: if the P's don't line up, the message gets muddled — but even when they do line up, that only lowers the odds of failure. It doesn't guarantee success.
So he proposes a new P: the Purple Cow. The idea came from a road trip. Driving through France with his family, they're struck by the cows grazing in the green fields along the road. Twenty minutes later, they've stopped noticing the cows — because they're all the same. However beautiful, they've become boring. Only a purple cow would grab attention. The conclusion: to be remarkable = to be worth talking about.
He then sketches three eras. Before advertising, there was word of mouth: everyone in the market knew who sold the best vegetables, so that stall was always packed. In the advertising era, a kind of magic formula worked — advertise straight to the customer, and sales go up. Pair the right agency with the right investor and you could grow a company as big as you could imagine. After the advertising era, Godin argues, we've essentially ended up back where we started.
This section holds the book's best example. In 1912, Otto Frederick Rohwedder invented sliced bread — a machine that cut a whole loaf into slices. The idea was brilliant, but the invention flopped completely. About twenty years later, a new brand called Wonder brought the same product to market — and this time it caught on. Godin's point: what drove the success wasn't the sliced bread itself, but the packaging and the advertising message. In other words, during the advertising era, a good product wasn't enough — you had to know how to shout.
Godin also stresses none of this is new. Tom Peters wrote in "The Pursuit of Wow" that only products made by passionate people have a future; Peppers and Rogers showed that keeping an old customer is cheaper than winning a new one. The problem is most companies treat these proven ideas as an interesting side note instead of putting them at the center of strategy. As a result, old techniques wear out fast, while the company keeps clinging to them.
What makes things worse: there was a time when everything was simple — invent something everyone wants, make the masses aware of it, make money. Godin gives the frozen pizza example — an idea out of a small pizzeria that reached millions through the right advertising strategy. Aspirin was the same: everyone needs it, it's cheap, and it works instantly.
Now that same pharmacy shelf has dozens of painkiller brands. As a second example, Godin points to yoga books: a few years ago a store carried three or four, and people would look them over and pick one. Today there are over five hundred yoga books on the market. No one has time to review five hundred options before buying a book. And most people already interested in yoga have already bought their book — they don't need a new one.
This is where the book's core diagnosis lands. The problem isn't that advertising is bad; it's that advertising no longer reaches people. People have less time, and they already own most of what they need. You spend more to defend market share, while the busy consumer simply tunes out messages they didn't ask for. Godin extends this even to permission-based channels: knowing someone's email address doesn't mean they want to hear from you.
The book's most striking section explains why advertising worked for so long. Godin calls this the "TV-industrial era" and compares it to the military-industrial complex: you buy ads, demand rises, the company grows, you buy more ads, you grow more. A closed, self-feeding loop. This formula ran for decades, and the entire marketing profession was built on it — Godin argues American companies' success over the last century largely came down to using this one lever well. Now that loop is broken, and it's not just TV: newspapers, magazines, every mass channel that shapes consumer behavior is in the same position.
Everything after this is the book's own answer. So we're stopping here, and we recommend you get the book and read it yourself — what Godin proposes doing, and how he shows it through dozens of real company examples, is the book's real value. But if what you've read so far interests you and you can't decide whether to buy it, you can check the spoiler section below.
- 40+ chapters, each 2–4 pages. Perfect for reading in transit, in line, in short bursts.
- "Case study" blocks are woven between chapters — one page of theory, followed by a real company.
- The tone is manifesto-like: claims aren't softened, there's no "maybe" or "somewhat."
- The core idea is repeated many times throughout the book. It helps it stick, but it can wear some readers down.
- The examples are from 2003. The logic hasn't aged, but some brands may be unfamiliar to today's reader.
The idea behind this book — read it first
A deeper look at how ideas spread
A different take on being "different" rather than "better"
Short answer: Godin doesn't say "be better" — he says "go to the extremes."
His logic: the safe middle path is actually the riskiest choice, because invisibility is death. So being remarkable doesn't happen by accident — it's deliberately engineered. A company first decides who will talk about it, then builds the product so that exact audience will talk — advertising is never an afterthought.
The second conclusion follows from the first: every Purple Cow has a short lifespan. What's remarkable eventually becomes ordinary, and competitors copy it. So Godin isn't asking you to repeat yourself — he's asking you to build the next one. This isn't a one-off campaign; it's an ongoing habit.
Third is the question of measurement: mass marketing hates measuring itself, because measurement reveals failure. Godin wants the opposite — measure, kill what's failing fast, double down on what works.
Fourth is pricing and positioning: Godin proposes not sitting in the middle, but standing at an extreme — cheapest, most expensive, or most unusual. Whatever sits in the middle is forgotten by everyone.
But the book's real value isn't these conclusions. Godin shows, through 35+ real examples, what this principle looks like in practice and where it fails. I won't walk through the examples here — most of the book is exactly that.
Coverage. This review covers only the book’s opening argument (pp. 4–24, ≈20%). The case studies aren’t discussed. The review was written from the Turkish translation (Mor İnek, Elma Yayıncılık).
Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If this review raises a copyright issue, or the reviewer has violated the site's guidelines, write to hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
"The opposite of remarkable is good" genuinely stopped me in my tracks. I ordered the book because of that one line.
A repetitiveness score of 4/5 is very honest. Reading it, it really did feel like the same point five times over.
If it hadn't flagged that the examples are from 2003, I'd have been thrown off. Glad there's a warning.