Moses and Monotheism
Good Fit
- Readers curious to see Freud's psychoanalytic method applied to religion and history
- Anyone intellectually curious about the origins of monotheism and the historical question of Moses' identity
- Readers of Freud's earlier works like "Totem and Taboo" wanting to see his final, culminating thesis
Not a Fit
- Readers who wish to approach religious texts only through faith, and are not open to a historical-critical/psychoanalytic lens
- Readers looking to take Freud's thesis as settled scholarly consensus — it is a controversial, often considered baseless, speculation rather than established historical fact
- Readers without patience for dense academic argumentation (footnotes, philological comparisons)
Freud opens by candidly admitting that "taking away" the man a people regards as its greatest son — that is, questioning his national identity — is no easy decision, especially when one belongs to that same people (Freud himself was ethnically Jewish) — but he proceeds on the principle that "in the search for truth, no consideration should deter us."
The first question is the origin of the name Moses: the traditional account (from the Book of Exodus) explains the name as meaning "drawn out of the water," but Freud finds this linguistically weak — it doesn't fit the Hebrew form "Mosheh," and it would be strange for an Egyptian princess to choose a Hebrew root in the first place.
Drawing on the research of the historian James Henry Breasted, Freud shows that the word "Moses" is actually Egyptian in origin — the element "mose" (child, son) was a common root in pharaonic names such as "Ah-mose" (Ahmose), "Tuth-mose" (Thutmose), and "Ra-mose" (Ramesses), usually combined with a god's name ("child of Amun," "child of Ptah") and later shortened to just "Mose."
From this linguistic fact, Freud notes with some surprise that no historian — not even Breasted, who accepted that Moses was "Egyptian in all his wisdom" — had drawn the further conclusion that the bearer of this name might himself have been Egyptian. Freud speculates this may stem from reverence for the biblical tradition, or simply because the idea of Moses not being Jewish struck people as too disturbing.
- Freud writes in the style of a scholarly paper, grounding every claim in footnotes and direct quotations from other historians such as Breasted — an academic rather than popular format
- The author's open admission of how sensitive his own thesis is ("this is the purpose of my short study," "may seem pointless to most readers") is a rare instance of academic humility
The same author's earlier work applying psychoanalysis to primitive religion and the origin of culture
Another of Freud's works, taking a broader view of religion's psychological function as a collective illusion
Freud goes on to advance an even more radical thesis: that Moses was actually an Egyptian nobleman who brought the monotheistic religion of Pharaoh Akhenaten (the cult of Aten) to the Israelites, and was later killed in a rebellion by his own people — a repetition of the "primal father murder" theory from Freud's "Totem and Taboo."
The book closes by arguing that the later "return of the repressed" — the resurfacing, across generations, of the buried memory of Moses's murder — is the core psychological mechanism underlying Jewish religious consciousness and, in Freud's view, all monotheistic culture.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
