Change Your Thoughts — Change Your Life: Living the Wisdom of the Tao
Good Fit
- Readers meeting the «Tao Te Ching» for the first time and wanting plain language
- People who like reading one short text a day and reflecting on it
- Fans of Wayne Dyer’s earlier books
Not a Fit
- Anyone seeking a serious, scholarly commentary on Taoist history and philosophy
- Readers tired of mystical «surrender to the universe» language
- Those expecting medical information on illness — the claims made here are not scientific
The preface captures the book’s spirit exactly. Dyer describes rising before 4 a.m. for a year, meditating, contemplating each verse for three days in front of framed pictures of Lao-tzu, then looking into the portrait and asking «what did you mean by this?» — after which words flow «from the atmosphere» through his purple pen. He even sees a sign in his name: «Way» — the Tao — and «dyer», one who imparts colour and light. The reader knows at once this is not historical or philosophical scholarship but a personal spiritual journal.
On the first verse — «The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao» — Dyer contrasts paradox with Western either/or logic and sets out his main idea: the difference between wanting and allowing. A gardener who wants tomatoes actually allows them to grow; wanting to sleep keeps you awake; once you have learned to ride a bicycle, there is no more trying, just riding. The examples are simple and clear, and this is the book’s best quality: linking an ancient, cryptic text to everyday experience.
Verse 78 — «Nothing in the world is softer and weaker than water, yet nothing is better at overcoming the hard and strong» — is among the most effective chapters. Dyer draws out three qualities of water and applies them to relationships, telling how a relative who harmed himself and others through years of heavy drinking slowly changed in the face of Dyer’s constant, loving response. Softness, patience and non-resistance recur throughout the book — sometimes soothing, sometimes monotonous.
The most problematic chapter is verse 71. Dyer presents illness as a physical sign of being out of harmony with the Tao, saying that «harbouring sick thoughts allows sickness to appear» and that it is impossible for someone living in harmony with the Tao to suffer from illness. His example is the controversial Indian guru Sathya Sai Baba «choosing not to suffer» despite hip fractures. Dyer’s own account of overcoming an addiction is sincere, but the overall message — explaining illness by thought — is medically wrong and can make sick people feel guilty.
The Turkish translation is at times stiff and artificial. Overall: a gentle introduction to the «Tao Te Ching» and an easy book to read a chapter a day; but readers after serious philosophy will do better with a good translation of Lao-tzu himself or an annotated scholarly edition. The health-related passages should be read as spiritual metaphor, never as medical advice.
- The same structure for all 81 verses: text, essay, daily exercise
- Ancient paradoxes explained through everyday examples (gardening, cycling, family)
- Verse versions chosen by comparing ten different translations
The original — a good translation may give more than Dyer’s commentary
A famous, playful introduction linking the Tao to everyday life
A more rational, research-based take on practical life wisdom
The most problematic chapter is the 71st. Dyer presents illness as the physical sign of «losing harmony with the Tao», saying that «to hold sick thoughts is to allow illness to rise» and that «it is impossible for a person living in harmony with the Tao to suffer from illness». These views have no medical basis and the health-related chapters must not be read as medical advice.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.