Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

Eat Yourself Slim… and Stay Slim!

Michel Montignac
Review by: Aytən Həsənova30 September 20261 min read
The core book of the 'Montignac Method', which sold millions of copies in the 1980s and 1990s: it rejects calorie counting, attributes weight gain mainly to insulin spikes caused by 'bad carbohydrates', and proposes a two-phase diet built on the glycaemic index. Some of its ideas — the glycaemic index itself, avoiding sugar and white flour, favouring fibre — later found scientific support. But categorical claims such as 'counting calories is nonsense' and 'low-calorie diets make you fat' contradict what science knows about energy balance, and allowing wine and beer with every meal even during the weight-loss phase is debatable.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers interested in the popular history of the glycaemic index
  • Anyone looking for simple rules to cut down on sugar and refined carbohydrates
  • Those who want to compare diet books with a critical eye
Not a Fit
  • Anyone seeking a current, evidence-based weight-loss guide
  • People with diabetes or heart disease who want to follow a diet without medical supervision
  • Readers who need to avoid alcohol — the book recommends wine with meals
How Readers Rate It
Readability 3.7/5 Easy
Ease of practice 3.4/5 Average
Scientific grounding 2.3/5 Weak
40 voters
Introduction, the chapter 'Low-Calorie Diets: A Failed Approach!' and the Phase One rules
Read: the author's introduction (personal story, US obesity statistics), Chapter 1 'Low-Calorie Diets: A Failed Approach!' (pp. 3–12) and the summary of Phase One rules (pp. 99–100) — about 10% of the book.

In the introduction Montignac tells his own story: his father was 1.73 m tall and weighed 120 kg, he himself was a fat child at eight, was teased as a teenager, and as an adult kept gaining weight despite eating little and exercising a lot. Reading scientific papers on diabetes, he noticed that type 2 diabetics improved their blood sugar by eating 'low-glycaemic' carbohydrates, tried the same approach on himself, and lost 16 kg in a few months without limiting quantities — only by choosing differently. The author is not a doctor, one of the most frequent criticisms of the book, though he writes that a team of physicians later gathered around him.

Chapter 1 is the book's most assertive part. Montignac calls the calorie model, which compares the human body to a 'boiler', a 'myth': fat people don't necessarily eat more, athletes can keep the same weight on anything from 2,000 to 6,000 calories, and calorie tables are imprecise. In his view a low-calorie diet triggers a 'survival instinct': the body cuts its spending, regains the lost weight with interest as soon as the diet lapses, and in women even creates new fat cells. A box in the middle of the chapter proclaims in capitals: 'COUNTING CALORIES IS NONSENSE'.

Some of these arguments rest on real observations: a modest slowing of metabolism after weight loss (metabolic adaptation) and the long-term failure of most diets are well documented, and calorie tables really are approximate. But concluding that 'calories don't matter' is scientifically wrong: controlled studies show that weight change is determined mainly by energy balance, while the effect of the glycaemic index is secondary. Charts in the chapter — such as a person eating 1,000 calories who climbs from 90 to 100 kg after a series of diets — are given without sources, and the statistic that 'only 15% of obese people overeat' comes from self-reported surveys in which people tend to under-report what they eat.

The Phase One rules, on the other hand, are practically sensible: eat three meals a day at set times, never skip a meal, avoid snacking, cut out sugary drinks, limit saturated fat in favour of olive and fish oils, eat slowly and chew well, choose wholegrain over white bread. Most of this advice still appears in healthy-eating guidelines today. What is debatable is permitting alcohol even in the weight-loss phase — 'no more than a glass of wine and a glass of beer with each meal' — and the rigid 'allowed/forbidden' fruit lists (for breakfast, bananas and chestnuts, for instance, are on the forbidden list).

In the end, the book matters historically for bringing the glycaemic index to a mass audience, and its message against sugar and white flour is still relevant. But its central theoretical claim — that calories are unimportant — is not supported by current science, and the book should not be used in place of advice from a doctor or dietitian. The Turkish translation is at times stilted.

Reading Experience
  • A clear two-phase structure with a rules summary at the end of each phase
  • Concrete menus and tables for breakfast, lunch and dinner
  • The author's personal experience woven together with theoretical explanation
Content Warning
The claim that 'calories don't matter' contradicts current scientific knowledgeAlcohol with meals is recommended even during the weight-loss phaseShould not be followed without medical supervision in diabetes, heart disease or pregnancySome charts and statistics are given without sources
If You Liked This
Living Vegan For DummiesAlexandra Jamieson

Another popular nutrition guide with both scientific and unscientific sides

The Pegan DietMark Hyman

A current diet book that opposes sugar and refined carbohydrates

Is Our Food Safe?Warren Leon, Caroline Smith DeWaal

An evidence- and risk-based look at food choices

Spoiler
How does this part end?
⚠️ The rules of the first phase

The rules of the first phase are reasonable in practical terms: eat three times a day at set times, don't skip meals, don't snack in between, avoid sugary drinks, limit saturated fats and prefer olive and fish oil, eat slowly, chewing well, choose wholegrain bread instead of white.

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
A reference book that gathers psychoanalytic defence mechanisms — from denial to rationalisation, projection to displacement — under a hundred and one headings; rich in clinical examples, valuable for professionals, and interesting but heavy going for general readers.
3.9 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
101 Defenses: How the Mind Shields Itself

101 Defenses: How the Mind Shields Itself

Jerome S. Blackman · Non-fiction
Reviews
The first book by a Turkish personal-development trainer known for seminars: a collection of short stories, anecdotes and quotations on happiness, success, goals, time and relationships. It has a sincere, warm tone and a few good examples from everyday life. But it is full of unsourced figures, mangled names and misattributed quotations, and its ideas repeat what can be read in dozens of other books in the genre.
2.6 / 5
ReviewsCavid Mehdiyev
Hayata Gülümse

Hayata Gülümse

Sıtkı Aslanhan · Non-fiction
Reviews
University of Cape Town philosophy professor David Benatar offers the most systematic academic defense of "antinatalism" — a harsh, logically tight argument that coming into existence is ALWAYS a serious harm; suited to readers ready to follow a rigorous philosophical argument rather than seeking emotional comfort.
4.1 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
Better Never to Have Been

Better Never to Have Been

David Benatar · Non-fiction
Reviews
A thematic introduction to large-scale world history from Kevin Reilly, founding president of the World History Association — the book opens with the Big Bang itself, races through cosmic and geological history up to the emergence of the human species, then gradually shifts into the great turning points of cultural history. A rare book that pairs academic rigor with genuinely accessible storytelling.
4.5 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
The Human Journey: A Concise Introduction to World History

The Human Journey: A Concise Introduction to World History

Kevin Reilly · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text