Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Novel

Famine

Andreas Frangias
Review by: İdris Muxtarzadə17 September 20261 min read
A harsh, allegorical novel of state repression by Greek novelist Andreas Frangias (1972), set on an unnamed prison island and populated by nameless characters known only by function (the inspector, the foreman, the timid one) — continuing the tradition of Kafka and Solzhenitsyn.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers who enjoy Kafka- and Orwell-style allegorical critiques of totalitarian systems
  • Anyone drawn to fiction grounded in real historical repression (the Makronisos island camp, the Greek Civil War)
  • Readers who appreciate nameless, function-defined characters and a harsh, minimalist dialogue style
  • Readers who prefer short, dense, metaphor-heavy prose over sprawling epic narrative
Not a Fit
  • Readers looking for a comfortable, linear plot with clear resolution — the novel is deliberately fragmented and ambiguous
  • Anyone sensitive to blunt, explicit depictions of physical and psychological coercion
  • Readers who find symbolic, unnamed setting/character techniques confusing
How Readers Rate It
Structure 4.2/5 Fragmented
Tone 4.2/5 Harsh/dark
Symbolism 4.1/5 Allegorical
39 voters
Chapters one and two: how the island's laws take shape
Covers the foreword, epigraph, and the first two chapters of Book One (pp. 9-27 of the book's ~224 pages, roughly 8%); the island's later fate and the ending are not addressed here. · for the spoiler the whole novel was read (book pp. 13–226)

The novel opens with a thirsty prisoner asking to drink water — he needs permission, because "it's the law." A simple request spirals into an absurd, faintly terrifying bureaucratic process involving several competing "directors," with no one quite sure who outranks whom. This scene establishes the book's core mechanism: power here is arbitrary, multi-layered, and impersonal, yet total.

The black-capped prisoner who "escorts" the thirsty man to drink is immediately accused of collaborating with an escape plot — a small kindness instantly reframed as a conspiracy. When the other prisoner hears the accusation, he shoots him a look of pure contempt that the black-capped man will carry for the rest of the story. Frangias shows the system's most effective weapon here: turning people against each other through suspicion.

The prisoners' underground bunks — pits a meter deep, shared by three or four men and nicknamed "family graves" — closely resemble actual graves. At night, occupants recognize each other only by breathing and posture; they read how someone's day went entirely through body language. As men die or are taken away, new faces cycle into their places.

A loudspeaker announcement declares the island's health and "civilization" under threat, and orders every inhabitant to catch and hand in at least twenty flies a day, on pain of severe punishment. The absurd quota is instantly wrapped in the rhetoric of "moral cleansing" — flies become a symbol of sin and "filth," and people must somehow find extra time to meet this pointless demand without falling behind on their actual labor.

That evening, the loudspeaker tells a bedtime-story allegory about a good king who tames "cursed monsters" on a lonely island. The moral is spelled out explicitly: the "monster" is the listener himself, and the authorities choose "rehabilitation" over killing only because dead men are of no use to "the mission." The parable exposes the dangerous, saccharine language of the camp's propaganda.

Critics (Menis Koumandareas, Yannis Dimitrakopoulos) compare the novel to Kafka's "In the Penal Colony" and Solzhenitsyn's "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" — in all three, the individual is reduced to a cog in a nameless system. What sets Frangias apart is how thoroughly he turns nature itself — sun, wind, flies — into an instrument of repression: nature, here, is as merciless as the guards.

Reading Experience
  • Naming characters purely by function (inspector, foreman, the timid one) creates a universalizing effect
  • Wind, sun, and flies are used as a relentless, wearying backdrop, building a claustrophobic sense of place
  • The loudspeaker's voice functions as power's constant, anonymous "voice"
  • Frequent use of ellipses (…) marks the things that are silenced or cannot be said aloud
Content Warning
Blunt depiction of physical and psychological violenceHeavy, suffocating atmosphere of a repressive prison camp
If You Liked This
In the Penal ColonyFranz Kafka

A similar bureaucratic, allegorical machine of repression and impersonal authority

One Day in the Life of Ivan DenisovichAleksandr Solzhenitsyn

A similar focus on daily camp life, in a stark, documentary-like style

Spoiler
The ending — the end of the «reform» and the sack with the cat
⚠️ The rest of the novel and its ending are revealed. Don't open it if you'd rather discover it yourself

Short answer: the «reform» on the island never ends — the methods change from the fly debt to rat poison, from night operations to isolation. In the end the most stubborn people are each put in a sack with a wild cat and dipped in the sea, and the book closes with the sentence «the truth is that those astonishing people managed to stay alive».

It starts like this: a thirsty man gets permission to drink, and the black-capped man ordered to escort him is accused of «informing on» him; the thirsty man looks at him with a gaze full of reproach, and both are sent to the valley. Then the authorities order every resident to hand in twenty flies a day, and the debts grow daily. In later chapters the black-capped man asks the thirsty one again and again, «do you suspect me?»; in the end the thirsty man says he trusts him.

The small man who handed in thirty-two flies is thrown into the sea by the night squad, but he swims and survives; the official report counts him as drowned. Later they find him, put him in a cage, tie him to a stake in the sea, and at last declare him drowned again — but he is found alive in the depot, on top of empty sacks. The population director offers him a way out under the name of someone else who has died; he refuses («I won't be an accomplice to a murder») and is put in an open cage for hunger and thirst experiments.

When the bridge falls behind schedule the foreman is put in a cage; later, once out of isolation, he says «I broke down in the face of loneliness». The timid man's optimistic friend, the engineer, throws himself into the sea after his evening speech, survives, and at the public humiliation is made to say «my foot slipped»; in the end, when dynamite goes off in the quarry, he throws himself onto it and dies. The black-capped man is beaten in the exam of candidate torturers and stays silent; later everyone who sees his bloodied hands tells him «so you are one of them too», and he dances on the walls shouting wild words.

Poison is laid for the rats, but they eat the bait and live. Then preparations are made for the «new arrivals» and an epidemic of nervous breakdown spreads; the man whose case is still pending learns that his «dearest friend» is the head of the night squad. A ship that arrives in the harbour is filled with the maimed and the deranged; the timid man recognises among them the third roommate, with holes in the soles of his shoes and green striped socks — and sees that his own shoes are the same. In the end the man who beat the monsters and the waves, the man who declared that he would not be an executioner, the hunter and others are brought to the shore; each is put in a sack with a wild cat, the sack is tied shut with rope, the cat is beaten and the sack is dipped into the sea — again and again. The book ends with the sentence «the truth is that those astonishing people managed to stay alive».

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
Two books of short essays Anday wrote for a newspaper column, mostly in the 1970s — 'New Gods' and 'Forbidden' — in a single volume. The opening essay still feels fresh: humanity never really left the age of myth, it simply replaced Zeus with computers and science as its 'new gods'. Most pieces deal with culture, language, reading and science, while some take a sharp stance on Turkish politics during the Cold War. There are strong ideas here, but without knowledge of the period's political context some essays are heavy going today.
3.7 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
New Gods Forbidden

New Gods Forbidden

Melih Cevdet Anday · Non-fiction
Reviews
The book wants to explain violence and sexual violence in history with the idea of «epigenetic continuity». In the first section read, the strongest side is the broad list of sources (many footnotes, German psychology and endocrinology textbooks) and the bold approach to the subject. The weakest side is the lack of a consistent argument: epigenetics is used as a metaphor, not in the scientific sense; the text jumps between paedophilia, genocide, political figures, hormones and religion, and some sentences (for example «herded societies») are unproven generalisation. It should be read not as an academic work but as a collection of the author's polemical essays.
2.8 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
Şiddet ve Tecavüz Tarihine Epigenetik Yaklaşım: Dün-Bugün

Şiddet ve Tecavüz Tarihine Epigenetik Yaklaşım: Dün-Bugün

Denis Dreisbusch · Non-fiction
Reviews
An overview that tries to fit all of Chinese history from the Xia to the Qing dynasty, plus Japan and Korea, into a pocket book: the final chapter comparing the three peoples' myths is interesting, but the Japan section is copied word for word from the same publisher's «Shinto» volume, some claims of «Turkic origins» lack any scholarly basis, and the vast subject stays superficial.
3.0 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
Far Eastern Civilisations — China, Japan, Korea

Far Eastern Civilisations — China, Japan, Korea

Douglas Baehr · Non-fiction
Reviews
A short information book on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that starts from the concepts of concentration and attention and covers types, diagnosis and common misconceptions: the «myth — fact» chapter and Russell Barkley's 10 rules for parents are genuinely useful, but most of the text is dry and textbook-like, and the bibliography puts esoteric «concentration» books next to scientific sources.
3.5 / 5
ReviewsCavid Mehdiyev
Attention Deficit — The Hyperactivity Barrier

Attention Deficit — The Hyperactivity Barrier

Angela Dainty · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text