Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World (Vol. II)

Daniel Yergin
Review by: İdris Muxtarzadə25 September 20261 min read
The second volume of Pulitzer winner Yergin's saga — on the history of climate science, carbon politics and the rebirth of renewables — is as vivid and information-packed as the first; Yergin's storytelling makes the history of science read like an adventure novel, though the 2011 figures have dated somewhat.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers of the first volume who want the rest of the energy story
  • Anyone seeking both scientific and political context on climate change
  • Those who like learning the history of science through human stories
  • Professionals and students in energy, ecology and international relations
Not a Fit
  • Readers looking for the latest figures and the energy market of the 2020s
  • Those expecting an activist call-to-arms on climate — Yergin is more of a neutral observer
  • Readers who tire of long, detailed historical narration
How Readers Rate It
Storytelling 4.3/5 Very vivid
Information density 4.0/5 Very dense
Up-to-dateness 3.4/5 Average
41 voters
Chapter 21 — «Change in the Glaciers»
The opening chapter of the second volume, chapter 21, which begins Part IV («Climate and Carbon»), was read in full and analysed (pp. 9–22, about 4% of the volume). The later chapters — Revelle and the «Age of Discovery», Rio, the carbon market, Copenhagen, renewables, biofuels and electric cars — are not analysed in this review.

The chapter opens with a scene that captures the spirit of the whole book: in August 1856 the Irish scientist John Tyndall sets out alone from the Swiss village of Interlaken, climbs onto a glacier and, amid the silence, hears the roar of an avalanche. The son of a policeman, trained in Germany under Bunsen, the man who explained why the sky is blue, Tyndall becomes bound to glaciers by a 'sense of wonder bordering on terror' — once a storm turns him back just 100 metres short of the Matterhorn's summit. Yergin is a true master at bringing the history of science to life with such human detail.

Tyndall's question was simple: if glaciers move and there was once an ice age, what changes the climate? Yergin takes the question's roots back to the 18th century: in the 1770s the Geneva professor Saussure builds a 'hot box' lined with dark cork — a miniature greenhouse — and suggests that the atmosphere might hold heat like glass; in the 1820s the French mathematician Fourier tries and fails to work out the mathematics; and in 1837 the Swiss Agassiz claims that Europe was once buried under giant ice sheets, only to be mocked by his colleagues.

The chapter's climax is Tyndall's basement laboratory at the Royal Institution in London. Disappointed to find nitrogen and oxygen transparent, he tries the coal gas piped into his lab, then water vapour and carbon dioxide, and discovers that they trap infrared radiation. On 18 May 1859 he writes in his diary that he has 'the subject completely in my hands', and soon afterwards, with Prince Albert presiding, gives the first public experimental demonstration of the greenhouse effect. His analogy — the atmosphere holding back heat like a dam built across a river — remains one of the clearest explanations to this day.

The story then moves to the Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius. In 1894, in the melancholy that followed his divorce and the loss of custody of his son, he spends months doing calculations by hand, sometimes 14 hours a day, and concludes that a doubling of carbon dioxide would bring 5–6 degrees of warming — astonishingly close to modern models. The most fascinating detail is that Arrhenius was not afraid: for a chemist who knew long, dark Swedish winters, warming was 'good news' promising milder climates and richer harvests for the northern lands.

At the end of the chapter Yergin shows how the idea of climate change was forgotten: the American Dust Bowl drought of the 1930s was blamed on 'weather', not 'climate'. In 1938 the amateur meteorologist and steam engineer Guy Callendar presented data showing rising carbon dioxide to the Royal Meteorological Society, but the professionals did not take him seriously. The idea, later known as the 'Callendar Effect', was forgotten again; in 1951 a climatologist wrote that the theory had been 'abandoned'. It is perfect preparation for the political drama of the chapters to come.

The chapter also works as a standalone essay, squeezing roughly two centuries of climate science into 14 pages. The only criticism: Yergin devotes so much attention to the personal dramas of figures like Tyndall and Arrhenius that the explanation of the scientific mechanisms sometimes comes up short — the physics of the greenhouse effect, for instance, gets only a paragraph or two at the start.

Reading Experience
  • Each scientific discovery is built on a specific person's life story
  • Extensive quotations from diaries, letters and interviews
  • Chapter endings that build a bridge to the next stage
  • Detailed notes and source references
Content Warning
No heavy themes; some sections are dense with technical and statistical detail
If You Liked This
The Quest (Vol. I): Oil, Natural Gas, ElectricityDaniel Yergin

The first volume of the same work — reviewed on our site

The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & PowerDaniel Yergin

The author's Pulitzer-winning history of oil — reviewed on our site

Spoiler
How does this part end?
⚠️ The Callendar effect is forgotten

At the end of the chapter Yergin shows how the climate idea came to be forgotten: in 1938 the amateur meteorologist Guy Callendar presents data proving that carbon dioxide is rising to the Royal Meteorological Society, but the professionals do not take him seriously. This idea, later to be called the «Callendar effect», is forgotten again; in 1951 a climatologist writes that the theory has been «abandoned».

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
The main book of Martin Seligman, one of the founders of positive psychology, explaining happiness through «positive emotion, strengths and meaning». In the first chapter that was read, the strongest side is that it tells scientific research (the nuns, the smile, the colonoscopy) like vivid stories and clearly shows the difference between «feeling good» and «the good life». The weak side is that some studies are limited to small samples and the American context and that the author places himself somewhat at the centre. It does not replace treatment of depression; a strong start for those curious about the scientific foundations of happiness.
4.0 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
Authentic Happiness

Authentic Happiness

Martin E. P. Seligman · Non-fiction
Reviews
Written in 1898 and considered one of the foundational texts of science fiction, this novel follows an unnamed narrator as Mars's dying civilization invades Earth — a still-potent critique of colonialism and human complacency, showing how the quiet daily life of Victorian London collapses within a matter of hours.
4.3 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
The War of the Worlds

The War of the Worlds

H. G. Wells · Fantasy
Reviews
A guide that helps writers build a character's psychological trauma systematically: the opening essays explain how a wound produces a «lie» and changes a character, followed by a dictionary of about a hundred kinds of trauma. In the part read, the strongest side is that a single fictional example (Paul) is followed through the entire theory and that the chain «wound — lie — fear — unmet need» is shown clearly. The weak side is that it simplifies psychological theory (such as Maslow's pyramid), is not a therapeutic resource and offers only a framework for writers.
3.5 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
The Emotional Wound Thesaurus

The Emotional Wound Thesaurus

Angela Ackerman, Becca Puglisi · Non-fiction
Reviews
A powerful work of documentary journalism that tells the attack of 11 September 2001 not through politics but from inside the World Trade Center, through the eyes of the people there. The New York Times reporters drew on interviews with survivors, thousands of pages of radio and phone transcripts and emails, and every detail is sourced. The book records not only the tragedy but also the questions: why the buildings were built as they were, and why rescuers could not hear one another. A heavy but important read.
4.5 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
102 Minutes

102 Minutes

Jim Dwyer, Kevin Flynn · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text