Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

The System: Who Owns the Internet, and How It Owns Us

James Ball
Review by: Türkanə Əliyeva24 September 20261 min read
A clear, bold and thought-provoking «unauthorised biography of the internet» from a journalist who worked on the Snowden files, stripping away the myth of the «cloud» and the «free space» to reveal the real power network of cables, data centres, investors, advertisers and intelligence agencies.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers who want to understand how the internet works and who controls it, without drowning in jargon
  • Those interested in privacy, data security and the power of Big Tech
  • Followers of the Snowden files, WikiLeaks and cyberwarfare
  • People working in journalism, law, politics or IT
Not a Fit
  • Anyone after a tech-optimist «the internet makes everything better» book
  • Specialists expecting deep technical detail on protocols, code and network architecture
  • Readers seeking a non-Western, especially Eurasian, perspective on the internet — the author himself admits the story is Western-centric
How Readers Rate It
Critical tone 3.8/5 Sharply critical
Technical difficulty 3.0/5 Average
Readability 4.0/5 Flowing
41 voters
Introduction and the start of Chapter 1 — «The Architects»
Covers the introduction (pp. 7–22 of the Turkish edition) and the opening of Part One's first chapter, «The Architects», about 8% of the book. Later chapters on cable companies, the domain system, venture capital, advertising, cyberwar and regulation are not assessed here.

Ball opens by showing how the internet's reputation changed: the 1990s «declaration of independence of cyberspace», companies setting out with «Don't be evil», WikiLeaks defying a superpower, social media's role in the Arab Spring, and finally the seventeen-minute dance show honouring Tim Berners-Lee at the 2012 London Olympics. By 2020 the same companies stood accused of disinformation, censorship and tax avoidance. His question: did the internet change, or did we misunderstand it from the start?

The book's thesis is stated plainly in the introduction: online power is really offline power. The internet — which seems free and natural like a «cloud» — is a network of physical cables and data centres, each with an owner, a financier and a regulator. Ball calls the four giants we casually equate with «the internet» (Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google) not the internet itself but locomotives running on its rails. The metaphor shapes the whole structure of the book.

The strongest historical parallel is the railways. In the 19th century they too were a communications technology, but because not everyone could lay track, the industry fell into the hands of a few companies and their backers, producing Gilded Age monopolies, a wealth gap and populism. Ball argues that the internet, «left to its own devices, is a machine for creating monopolies», and that without political will and new branches of law the outcome could be the same. The parallel is both striking and sobering.

The author introduces himself as an «internet kid»: fifteen minutes a day on AOL at age seven, online games and self-taught coding as a teenager, then tech reporter, WikiLeaks staffer and journalist working on the Snowden documents. This background lends the book both credibility and liveliness. Ball honestly acknowledges that the internet's story is overwhelmingly Western and patriarchal, and that telling it without accounting for this would distort it.

Chapter 1, «The Architects», opens with a precise date: on the evening of 29 October 1969, a group of young academics at UCLA prepares to send the first message over what we now call the internet. Ball shows that the idea of an «independent internet» was never quite what it seemed — the decisions and protocols made largely unsupervised in its first thirty years were closer to governments and institutions from the start.

The Turkish translation reads fluently, though scan quality is poor and some names are garbled. Written in 2020, the book does not cover the latest developments of the AI era. Even so, it is an excellent guide to the power structure behind the internet we use every day, and it ends with a glossary of technical terms.

Reading Experience
  • The book is divided into three parts (Mechanism, Money, War), each chapter devoted to a group of actors
  • Historical parallels such as the railways make an abstract subject accessible
  • The author draws on interviews with people who make decisions behind closed doors
  • A glossary of technical terms and further reading list close the book
Content Warning
No sensitive contentThemes of mass surveillance, cyberattacks and political manipulation
If You Liked This
The SearchJohn Battelle

On how the search engine and its advertising model shaped the internet economy — reviewed on our site

Digital Transformation: Survive and Thrive in an Era of Mass ExtinctionThomas M. Siebel

A more optimistic, entrepreneurial view of how digital technology is changing business — reviewed on our site

Spoiler
How does this part end?
⚠️ 29 October 1969, UCLA

The first chapter, «The Architects», opens with an exact date: on the evening of 29 October 1969 a group of young academics at UCLA prepare to send the first message over the network we now call the internet. Ball shows that the idea of an «independent internet» was never really what it seemed — the decisions and protocols taken in the first thirty years were closer to government and institutions from the start.

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
After psychotherapist Megan Devine watched a partner, Matt, drown, all that professional knowledge suddenly felt useless — and the result is a very different book about grief: grief is not «a problem to be solved» but a natural extension of love, and consoling platitudes like «everything happens for a reason» or «you're strong, you'll get through this» often wound. Sincere, brave and genuinely comforting for anyone facing a major loss; its only weaknesses are some repetition and a focus on American culture.
4.1 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
It’s OK That You’re Not OK — Meeting Grief and Loss in a Culture That Doesn’t Understand

It’s OK That You’re Not OK — Meeting Grief and Loss in a Culture That Doesn’t Understand

Megan Devine · Non-fiction
Reviews
A short, ironic and strange novel by the German Christine Wunnicke, inspired by the life of Shimamura Shunichi, a real historical figure reckoned among the first neurologists in Japan. Its strongest side is the dry humour built on the illness of fox possession, Charcot's hysteria demonstrations in Paris and the misunderstandings between East and West, and a thought-provoking play on memory. Its weak side is that the layers of time often mix and that it leans on notes. Not for those expecting a classic historical novel; for lovers of strange, light, many-sided literature.
3.9 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
The Fox and Dr. Shimamura

The Fox and Dr. Shimamura

Christine Wunnicke · Novel
Reviews
A warm, fast read that a modern fable sometimes withholds from itself the full weight of its own philosophy.
4.6 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
The Midnight Library

The Midnight Library

Matt Haig · Novel
Reviews
A multi-pronged scientific case for longevity built on Valter Longo's 30 years of research into the fasting-mimicking diet and the "Five Pillars" methodology.
4.2 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
The Longevity Diet

The Longevity Diet

Valter Longo · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text