The System: Who Owns the Internet, and How It Owns Us
Good Fit
- Readers who want to understand how the internet works and who controls it, without drowning in jargon
- Those interested in privacy, data security and the power of Big Tech
- Followers of the Snowden files, WikiLeaks and cyberwarfare
- People working in journalism, law, politics or IT
Not a Fit
- Anyone after a tech-optimist «the internet makes everything better» book
- Specialists expecting deep technical detail on protocols, code and network architecture
- Readers seeking a non-Western, especially Eurasian, perspective on the internet — the author himself admits the story is Western-centric
Ball opens by showing how the internet's reputation changed: the 1990s «declaration of independence of cyberspace», companies setting out with «Don't be evil», WikiLeaks defying a superpower, social media's role in the Arab Spring, and finally the seventeen-minute dance show honouring Tim Berners-Lee at the 2012 London Olympics. By 2020 the same companies stood accused of disinformation, censorship and tax avoidance. His question: did the internet change, or did we misunderstand it from the start?
The book's thesis is stated plainly in the introduction: online power is really offline power. The internet — which seems free and natural like a «cloud» — is a network of physical cables and data centres, each with an owner, a financier and a regulator. Ball calls the four giants we casually equate with «the internet» (Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google) not the internet itself but locomotives running on its rails. The metaphor shapes the whole structure of the book.
The strongest historical parallel is the railways. In the 19th century they too were a communications technology, but because not everyone could lay track, the industry fell into the hands of a few companies and their backers, producing Gilded Age monopolies, a wealth gap and populism. Ball argues that the internet, «left to its own devices, is a machine for creating monopolies», and that without political will and new branches of law the outcome could be the same. The parallel is both striking and sobering.
The author introduces himself as an «internet kid»: fifteen minutes a day on AOL at age seven, online games and self-taught coding as a teenager, then tech reporter, WikiLeaks staffer and journalist working on the Snowden documents. This background lends the book both credibility and liveliness. Ball honestly acknowledges that the internet's story is overwhelmingly Western and patriarchal, and that telling it without accounting for this would distort it.
Chapter 1, «The Architects», opens with a precise date: on the evening of 29 October 1969, a group of young academics at UCLA prepares to send the first message over what we now call the internet. Ball shows that the idea of an «independent internet» was never quite what it seemed — the decisions and protocols made largely unsupervised in its first thirty years were closer to governments and institutions from the start.
The Turkish translation reads fluently, though scan quality is poor and some names are garbled. Written in 2020, the book does not cover the latest developments of the AI era. Even so, it is an excellent guide to the power structure behind the internet we use every day, and it ends with a glossary of technical terms.
- The book is divided into three parts (Mechanism, Money, War), each chapter devoted to a group of actors
- Historical parallels such as the railways make an abstract subject accessible
- The author draws on interviews with people who make decisions behind closed doors
- A glossary of technical terms and further reading list close the book
On how the search engine and its advertising model shaped the internet economy — reviewed on our site
A more optimistic, entrepreneurial view of how digital technology is changing business — reviewed on our site
The first chapter, «The Architects», opens with an exact date: on the evening of 29 October 1969 a group of young academics at UCLA prepare to send the first message over the network we now call the internet. Ball shows that the idea of an «independent internet» was never really what it seemed — the decisions and protocols taken in the first thirty years were closer to government and institutions from the start.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.