Why Good People Do Bad Things
Good Fit
- Readers interested in Jungian psychology and the concept of the Shadow
- Anyone trying to understand the contradictions in human behavior — why "good" people sometimes act destructively
- Readers who enjoy dense nonfiction rich with literary and philosophical references (Freud, Plato, scripture, poetry)
- Readers unafraid of uncomfortable questions about self-knowledge and personal responsibility
Not a Fit
- Readers looking for quick, "5-step" practical advice — the book offers a conceptual framework rather than concrete prescriptions
- Anyone unfamiliar with Jungian terminology (archetype, complex, persona) looking for an easy first introduction — the book explains these concepts but is written densely
- Readers expecting a scientifically/empirically grounded psychology book — this one leans on literary-philosophical argument rather than clinical case studies
The book opens with Hollis's core thesis: what we call the "self" isn't one unified entity but is constantly made up of fragmented, multiple "sub-selves" — this fragmentation is what Jung called the Shadow.
In the Introduction, Hollis grounds the question in real, familiar examples: a respected accountant who embezzles from a foundation's funds, a politician who fiercely condemns gay rights only to be revealed as gay himself, a churchgoing woman who can't stop laughing when her wealthy neighbor slips and falls in the mud, an educator who secretly raids his children's college fund to feed a gambling habit.
Hollis connects this paradox to Plato's myth of the Ring of Gyges — would an invisible shepherd stay honest? Hollis treats Plato's optimistic answer (that people would act morally if they fully grasped the consequences) as naive, noting that modern philosophers have called this the "Socratic fallacy."
The concept of the Shadow is traced through the historical context of Freud and Jung — from Freud's discovery of the unconscious to Jung's insight that the Shadow carries not just negative material but creative, "golden" potential as well (illustrated by Jung's own childhood dream of golden excrement falling from the sky and destroying a cathedral tower).
Chapter 1 introduces the four ways the Shadow manifests: remaining unconscious, being projected onto others, seizing control of consciousness entirely, or being recognized and integrated. Only the first — remaining unconscious — is covered in this excerpt, illustrated through familiar composite characters (Shirley, Edwina, Charles, Elena) who harm others without ever recognizing their own Shadow at work.
This section demonstrates the book's method throughout: rather than clinical case studies, the argument is built from familiar everyday characters, literary references (Hawthorne, Kumin), and Jung's own words.
- A dense, essayistic style that blends Jungian terminology (Shadow, complex, archetype) with literature, poetry, and everyday examples
- Each chapter opens with an epigraph (from Jung, scripture, or poets), pairing an academic tone with a personal, occasionally wry voice
- Uses archetypal, relatable composite characters (Shirley, Edwina, Charles) rather than clinical case studies, so readers recognize themselves
- Structured as expanding "circles," moving from the individual Shadow outward to the social, institutional, and cosmic levels
A broader, illustrated introduction to core Jungian concepts, including the Shadow
A shorter, poetry-infused alternative take on the Shadow concept
In later chapters, Hollis moves from the personal Shadow (Chapter 3, "Meeting Ourselves") to the hidden agendas in close relationships (Chapter 5), the collective/social Shadow (Chapter 6), and the institutional Shadow (Chapter 7).
The book's final stretch turns more philosophical — covering the Shadow of modernism, "God's Shadow side" (one of Jung's most controversial ideas), and finally the "Positive Shadow," the idea that the Shadow carries creative as well as destructive potential — closing with a call to consciously "work" with one's Shadow.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
