A Brief History of Atlantis
Good Fit
- Readers interested in ancient Greek history, philosophy and myth
- Those who want source-based analysis rather than sensation about Atlantis
- Anyone curious about how pseudoscience is born
Not a Fit
- Readers expecting an adventure about Atlantis being “found”
- Those who tire of an academic style full of notes and quotations
- Readers looking for a short popular introduction — it runs over 450 pages
The book opens with “Myths are good to think with” and poses the key questions: is the Atlantis Plato describes in the Timaeus and Critias a real island and a real geological event filtered through myth, or another kind of myth-making? The author's answer can be sensed from the start: Plato's story is a wonderful tale told to explore the questions “what is the ideal state, and how should it behave under the pressure of foreign invasion?” The real hero is not Atlantis but ancient Athens, the embodiment of the ideal state; Atlantis is the decaying imperialist aggressor.
Chapter one's strongest idea is simple but very effective: before Plato, Atlantis exists nowhere. Kershaw shows this point by point: there is no island called Atlantis in Homer's Iliad or Odyssey, in Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns or Pindar, in Herodotus the “Father of History”, in the three great Athenian tragedians Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, in Aristophanes, or on any vase painting or sculpture. It is no accident that Critias' listeners are astonished: they are hearing the name for the first time. Kershaw also explains an important linguistic detail: “Atlantis” in Greek means “of Atlas” — and this Atlas is not the Titan who holds up the sky, but the eldest son of Poseidon and Cleito.
The rest of the chapter is devoted to the “other” legendary islands of Greek myth, and these are the book's most enjoyable pages: Ogygia, where Calypso kept Odysseus for seven years; Scheria, where Odysseus washes up after his raft is wrecked, with Alcinous' palace guarded by gold and silver dogs and an orchard that bears fruit all year; Erytheia, where Heracles steals the cattle of three-bodied Geryon; the golden apples of the Hesperides; the Hyperboreans, who know neither illness nor old age. Kershaw shows that in antiquity, too, Strabo, Plutarch, Herodotus and others argued endlessly about where these places were — Eratosthenes said he would believe in Odysseus' voyage when someone found the leather-worker who stitched up the bag of winds.
This comparison reveals the book's core method: Plato's Atlantis — the concentric canals, temples clad in gold and silver, the bountiful island — is built from the familiar elements of legendary literature, like Homer's Scheria. Kershaw reminds us that Plato, who criticised Homer as a “maker of phantoms of virtue”, knew his poetry in every detail. The chapter ends with Herodotus' map of the world and the observation that here, too, there is no reference to Atlantis.
The book has weaknesses: the middle chapters sometimes turn into long lists of names and theories, the notes are many, and the Turkish translation is heavy in places and weighed down with bracketed explanations. Still, it is one of the most honest books you can read about Atlantis: the author treats both the comic theories and dangerous ideas like the Nazi “Atlantean race” with equal seriousness and traces every claim back to its source.
- The author's own new translation of the Timaeus and Critias
- Plentiful quotations from ancient sources and clear comparisons
- A cool, ironic approach to pseudoscience
The original source of the Atlantis legend
The same author's guide to Greek mythology
To compare with the alternative-history approach the author criticises
This comparison shows the book's main method: Plato's description of Atlantis — circular canals, temples adorned with gold and silver, an island of abundant fruit — is built from familiar elements of legendary literature, like Homer's Scheria.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.