Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

A Brief History of Atlantis

In English: A Brief History of Atlantis: Plato's Ideal State
Stephen P. Kershaw
Review by: Rafel Əlizadə05 October 20261 min read
A serious, entertaining and rich book in which an Oxford tutor of the ancient world moves the Atlantis legend away from “where was it?” and towards “why did Plato tell this story?”. Its greatest strength is method: Kershaw first presents the other legendary islands of Greek myth, then Plato's era, then a new translation of the Timaeus and Critias, and only then examines two thousand years of Atlantis theories — from the age of Columbus to the Nazis, from Blavatsky to the Santorini volcano. The weak side: the book is thick and heavily annotated, and some chapters read like lists. The Turkish translation is heavy in places. One of the best choices for readers who want common sense rather than sensation about Atlantis.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers interested in ancient Greek history, philosophy and myth
  • Those who want source-based analysis rather than sensation about Atlantis
  • Anyone curious about how pseudoscience is born
Not a Fit
  • Readers expecting an adventure about Atlantis being “found”
  • Those who tire of an academic style full of notes and quotations
  • Readers looking for a short popular introduction — it runs over 450 pages
How Readers Rate It
Readability 3.1/5 Average
Scholarly reliability 4.3/5 Strong
Scope 4.4/5 Broad
40 voters
Introduction and Chapter 1: Ancient Mythical and Semi-Mythical Lands
Read: the acknowledgements, the introduction and the first chapter in full («The Island of Atlas», «Homer's Odyssey: Ogygia and Scheria», «Erytheia — the Red Land», «Hesperia», «Hyperborea», «Britain») — about 8% of the book. The argument of the first chapter is at the centre of the analysis.

The book opens with “Myths are good to think with” and poses the key questions: is the Atlantis Plato describes in the Timaeus and Critias a real island and a real geological event filtered through myth, or another kind of myth-making? The author's answer can be sensed from the start: Plato's story is a wonderful tale told to explore the questions “what is the ideal state, and how should it behave under the pressure of foreign invasion?” The real hero is not Atlantis but ancient Athens, the embodiment of the ideal state; Atlantis is the decaying imperialist aggressor.

Chapter one's strongest idea is simple but very effective: before Plato, Atlantis exists nowhere. Kershaw shows this point by point: there is no island called Atlantis in Homer's Iliad or Odyssey, in Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns or Pindar, in Herodotus the “Father of History”, in the three great Athenian tragedians Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, in Aristophanes, or on any vase painting or sculpture. It is no accident that Critias' listeners are astonished: they are hearing the name for the first time. Kershaw also explains an important linguistic detail: “Atlantis” in Greek means “of Atlas” — and this Atlas is not the Titan who holds up the sky, but the eldest son of Poseidon and Cleito.

The rest of the chapter is devoted to the “other” legendary islands of Greek myth, and these are the book's most enjoyable pages: Ogygia, where Calypso kept Odysseus for seven years; Scheria, where Odysseus washes up after his raft is wrecked, with Alcinous' palace guarded by gold and silver dogs and an orchard that bears fruit all year; Erytheia, where Heracles steals the cattle of three-bodied Geryon; the golden apples of the Hesperides; the Hyperboreans, who know neither illness nor old age. Kershaw shows that in antiquity, too, Strabo, Plutarch, Herodotus and others argued endlessly about where these places were — Eratosthenes said he would believe in Odysseus' voyage when someone found the leather-worker who stitched up the bag of winds.

This comparison reveals the book's core method: Plato's Atlantis — the concentric canals, temples clad in gold and silver, the bountiful island — is built from the familiar elements of legendary literature, like Homer's Scheria. Kershaw reminds us that Plato, who criticised Homer as a “maker of phantoms of virtue”, knew his poetry in every detail. The chapter ends with Herodotus' map of the world and the observation that here, too, there is no reference to Atlantis.

The book has weaknesses: the middle chapters sometimes turn into long lists of names and theories, the notes are many, and the Turkish translation is heavy in places and weighed down with bracketed explanations. Still, it is one of the most honest books you can read about Atlantis: the author treats both the comic theories and dangerous ideas like the Nazi “Atlantean race” with equal seriousness and traces every claim back to its source.

Reading Experience
  • The author's own new translation of the Timaeus and Critias
  • Plentiful quotations from ancient sources and clear comparisons
  • A cool, ironic approach to pseudoscience
Content Warning
Analysis of Nazi racial theoriesMythological violence and scenes of human sacrificeFew heavy themes
If You Liked This
Timaeus and CritiasPlato

The original source of the Atlantis legend

A Brief Guide to the Greek MythsStephen P. Kershaw

The same author's guide to Greek mythology

Fingerprints of the GodsGraham Hancock

To compare with the alternative-history approach the author criticises

Spoiler
How does this part end?
⚠️ Plato's Atlantis: familiar elements

This comparison shows the book's main method: Plato's description of Atlantis — circular canals, temples adorned with gold and silver, an island of abundant fruit — is built from familiar elements of legendary literature, like Homer's Scheria.

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text