Agnosticism — Proof of the Unknowable, Absence of the Knowable
Good Fit
- Readers looking for a third position beyond a flat "yes" or "no" on religious questions
- Anyone who wants to clearly understand the difference between atheism and agnosticism
- Fans of short, dense, "pocket" philosophy primers (96 pages)
- Readers who want Huxley, Russell, and Dawkins's views on this topic gathered in one place
Not a Fit
- Readers seeking a direct answer to "does God exist?" rather than a history of agnosticism
- Anyone who prefers popular-science prose over academic-philosophical language
- Readers who won't patiently follow through to specialized topics like the rationality of religious language (chapter 10)
The book opens by unpacking the term itself: 'agnostic' comes from the Greek for 'unknown/unknowable,' but the author quickly cautions this isn't simply 'I don't know' — as philosopher Alvin Plantinga distinguishes, in the popular sense someone who disbelieves in God is an atheist while someone who neither believes nor disbelieves is agnostic; in the more technical sense, agnosticism holds that human reason lacks sufficient rational grounds to render a definitive verdict on God's existence or non-existence.
The difference between these two definitions matters: the first amounts to withholding judgment, a kind of skepticism, while the second amounts to not accepting God's existence for lack of sufficient evidence — the book openly admits this second kind is hard to distinguish from atheism.
English biologist Thomas Huxley is introduced as the term's originator — Huxley explains his reasoning by confessing that as he reached intellectual maturity, the more he learned and thought, the less prepared he felt to call himself an atheist, theist, pantheist, materialist, or Christian.
The chapter then turns to an older current, Gnosticism: a mystical teaching that eclectically fused ancient Egyptian, Greek (Plato, Pythagoras), Hebrew, Zoroastrian, and early Christian traditions, promising salvation through 'gnosis' — hidden knowledge attained through intuition.
Drawing on Gnostic texts (the 'Apocryphon of John' from the Nag Hammadi collection), God is presented as wholly separate from humanity, beyond all description, an utterly 'unknowable' being — the book notes what root connections this shares with the philosophical agnosticism covered in later chapters.
- Each chapter is devoted to a single thinker (Russell, Dawkins, Kenny, Darwin), making the structure textbook-clear and easy to navigate
- Liberal use of direct quotations from primary sources (Huxley, Gnostic texts)
- A tight 96-page length matching the "From Zero in One Breath" series format
- A mid-level style blending academic precision with popular explanation
The same series' volume on atheism, useful for a direct comparison
The classic covered in the book's Chapter 3, approaching agnosticism from a sharper atheist angle
At the end of the part read, with quotations from Gnostic texts (the «Apocryphon of John»), God is presented as a being wholly separate from man, beyond every description, «unknowable». The book notes that this shares roots with philosophical agnosticism.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
