Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Novel

Hollywood

Charles Bukowski
Review by: İdris Muxtarzadə16 September 20261 min read
A semi-autobiographical novel narrated by Bukowski's alter ego Henry Chinaski, recounting his experience writing the screenplay for "Barfly" in a caustic, wry, unsentimental voice — a mirror held up to Hollywood's egos, actors, and producers.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers who enjoy Bukowski's blunt, unadorned, direct prose style
  • Anyone who wants to see the film industry's underbelly with cynicism rather than glamour
  • Readers who find parody of recognizable real figures (under changed names) engaging
  • Anyone who can read dark humor, alcohol, and failure themes without flinching
Not a Fit
  • Readers who want Hollywood portrayed in a romanticized, inspirational way
  • Anyone bothered by crude language or explicit depictions of drinking/sex
  • Readers seeking a classic, linear plot — the book is largely an episodic chain of encounters
How Readers Rate It
Tone 4.1/5 Sardonic
Autobiographical weight 3.9/5 Lived
Language harshness 4.0/5 Crude/explicit
41 voters
First encounters: Pinchot, François, and the "Lido Mamin" film
Covers the opening chapters (pp. 7–61, ~17% of the 316-page book) — from Chinaski's first meeting with Pinchot through negotiations with producer Harold Fezant, the introduction of German director "Wenner Zergog" (a thinly-veiled Werner Herzog), and his run-in with fans at a biker bar. The screenplay's own fate and whether the film gets made are not revealed here. · for the spoiler pp. 118–149 and 227–315 were read (the script going out and the financing, the shoot being halted, editing, Cannes, the premiere and the ending)

The book opens with Chinaski's meeting with young director Jon Pinchot (a fictionalized version of the real Barbet Schroeder) — Pinchot presses him for the long-overdue screenplay, and the two visit a circle of friends in Marina del Rey.

At this gathering, Chinaski meets a string of eccentric figures: a roulette-obsessed French actor named François Racine, and a manic German director named Wenner Zergog (an obvious caricature of Werner Herzog) — all presented with their own inflated egos and worldviews, none of them idealized by Bukowski.

Pinchot informs Chinaski that acclaimed producer Harold Fezant is interested in the screenplay — but Chinaski himself hasn't written a single line yet, setting up the book's central tension: a writer who doesn't want to write, versus an industry that demands he does.

At a film screening, Chinaski watches a movie about a dictator named "Lido Mamin" ruling a small, brutal country — an open jab at the industry's tendency to aestheticize violence without limit.

The novel then shifts to a subplot of Chinaski and Sara house-hunting — real-estate agents looking down on them, followed by a run-in at a rough biker bar where Chinaski is recognized and nearly swarmed by his own fans.

This chain of episodes demonstrates Bukowski's core method: viewing the grand, 'artistic' facade of the Hollywood world through the lens of his own everyday, crude, alcohol-soaked reality, rendering it both ridiculous and oddly poignant at once.

Reading Experience
  • Short, blunt sentences and heavy dialogue — Bukowski's signature poetic 'dirty realism'
  • Real Hollywood figures (Schroeder, Herzog, Rourke, Dunaway) become recognizable satire targets under altered names
  • First-person narration in Chinaski's bittersweet, self-mocking voice
  • Episodic structure — each chapter is a separate encounter or party, rather than traditional cause-and-effect plotting
Content Warning
Frequent and explicit depiction of alcohol consumptionCrude language and sexually explicit jokesCritical/satirical depictions based on real, recognizable people (under altered names)
If You Liked This
Post OfficeCharles Bukowski

An earlier Chinaski novel, focused on his working life before fame

Bright Lights, Big CityJay McInerney

A similarly drunk, cynical portrait of urban life, in a different industry setting

Spoiler
The film's fate and the book's ending
⚠️ The rest of the film's production process is revealed here.

Short answer: the script becomes a film, but the road there is marked by money trouble, the production company constantly cutting the budget, and a shoot that is halted once. The film is finished, wins nothing at Cannes and plays in a few cinemas, while Chinaski goes back to the racetrack and finally decides to write a novel about it all, to be called «Hollywood».

The script is sent to producers, agents and actors; some find it interesting but say such a subject will be hard to sell to an audience. Then Mack Austin likes the script; he and Jon both want Tom Pell for the lead, and Tom is willing to work for a dollar, but he insists on Austin as director. Jon is on bad terms with Austin and refuses; at a meeting at Chinaski's house the argument runs for hours and no agreement is reached. A few days later Jon reports that Jack Bledsoe has read the script and wants the lead; Francine Bowers also agrees to a reduced fee.

The film is to be made by «Firepower Production» (Harry Fridman and Nate Fishman); Fridman sees no need to read the script. A «play or pay» clause goes into Jack's contract. Then Fridman and Fishman want to push out Jon's producing partners, Tim Raddi and Lance Edwards; by Jon's account the company's shares have fallen from 40 dollars to 4, the budget is cut again and again, and the shoot is squeezed from 34 days to 32. At the meeting in Fridman's office he shouts, calls the two producers «bloodsuckers» and offers them 15 thousand dollars between them.

One morning Jon phones to say the shoot has been stopped: the «Firepower» building is empty, some of the staff have gone two weeks without pay, and Jon says «this is the end». Unexpectedly the shoot resumes: according to Jon, the company has sold its hotels in Europe and its film library and taken a loan from an Italian corporation. The 32-day shoot is completed. During editing Fridman and Fishman phone from London shouting «stop the editing!» and want cheap, rights-free music; Jon blends the good music with the soundtrack so that nothing can be cut out later. The film wins no prize at the Cannes festival.

The premiere takes place at a cinema in a shopping mall: Chinaski and Sara sit in the front row by the wall, see long bodies and enormous heads on the screen, and can't follow the dialogue. At the party afterwards Jack Bledsoe turns up and says «I don't drink». The film plays in 3–4 cinemas: «The New York Times» praises it, the reviewer at «The New Yorker» dislikes it, Rik Talbot puts it among the year's ten best, and on TV Wexler and Selby tear into it. At the end Chinaski and Sara watch the audience come out of an evening showing in San Pedro; at home, when Sara asks «what will you do now?», Chinaski says «I'll write a novel about writing the script and making the film», and he'll call it «Hollywood».

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Contents
God, Design, and Fine-Tuning — Robin Collins 17 – 58
The Argument from Desire — Caner Taslaman 59 – 100
The Axiological Argument — Enis Doko 101 – 144
The Kalam Cosmological Argument — William Lane Craig 145 – 173
The Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism — Alvin Plantinga 175 – 226
Reassessing the Fine-Tuning Argument — Richard Swinburne 227 – 256
4.5 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
God, Philosophy and Science

God, Philosophy and Science

Caner Taslaman, Enis Doko (ed.) · Non-fiction
Reviews
A tidy, easy-reading book that turns research on attention into everyday advice. Bailey proposes two modes: focusing fully on one task («hyperfocus») and deliberately letting the mind wander («scatterfocus»). The second is the most valuable part, because it shows that creative ideas arrive precisely when we stop focusing. But the book stretches some simple ideas, and much of the advice will be familiar from productivity blogs.
3.7 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
Hyperfocus

Hyperfocus

Chris Bailey · Non-fiction
Reviews
An emotional-healing guide with a religious perspective, in which an American Muslim teacher trained in psychology explains inner emptiness, pain and suffering through both modern psychological research and the Qur'an, hadith and stories of the prophets.
4.0 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
Healing the Emptiness: A Guide to Emotional and Spiritual Well-Being

Healing the Emptiness: A Guide to Emotional and Spiritual Well-Being

Yasmin Mogahed · Non-fiction
Reviews
A powerful history that tells, through archival documents, diaries and vivid anecdotes, the fierce rivalry between Britain and the United States behind their «allied» façade in the Middle East from the Second World War to 1971 — diplomatic history that reads like a thriller.
4.2 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
Lords of the Desert

Lords of the Desert

James Barr · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text