Every Child Has a Thinking Style
Good Fit
- Parents struggling with a child's messiness and the constant «tidy up!» battle
- Families with several children of different temperaments
- Teachers and carers seeking approaches suited to different learning styles
- Readers who like short quizzes and concrete practical tips
Not a Fit
- Those seeking scientific, evidence-based child psychology — the «brain type» theory is scientifically contested
- Parents looking for professional advice on clinical issues such as ADHD
- Readers unfamiliar with American consumer culture who want local examples
In the foreword, «brain function» specialist Arlene Taylor describes watching preschoolers through a one-way mirror: Jerry, who wants everything in its place; Sally, who lays out the contents of her bag neatly on the table; Ellie, who arrives with just a notebook and pen and wants a laptop so she won't have to carry paper; Sam, who stares out of the window and comes up with the most unusual ideas. These small portraits present the book's core idea vividly: children organise the world in different ways.
Taylor then claims the brain divides into four parts, that one is «innately dominant» in each person, and that using this dominance saves energy. Caution is needed here: splitting the brain into four fixed «types» and explanations like «lower resistance across the synaptic gap» are not established neuroscience but a popular model. The book presents it as unquestioned fact, which is its weakest point.
Chapter 1 is more convincing and personal. Nakone describes her own childhood: her mother, like Carol Brady of «The Brady Bunch», loved perfect order and lived by «a place for everything», while her father lost his desk under piles of paper and believed his keys «grew legs and ran away». Little Lanna tried to fit her mother's system and was labelled «disorganised». The author's conclusion is simple and touching: nobody was right or wrong; they were just different.
The chapter's central message is useful to parents: organisation doesn't fit a single correct model; homes should be arranged around the needs of everyone living in them, and differences should be treated as opportunities rather than erased. The author notes that many of her adult clients would not need her had they learned basic organising skills as children — which makes the book's motivation clear.
In «Children Have Changed», Nakone lists consumer statistics: spending by 4- to 12-year-olds has tripled since 1990, household possessions have grown by 50%, and $15 billion was spent in one year on advertising to children. Her observations about «toy graveyards» in bedrooms and school bags as heavy as aircraft hangars will ring true. But the direct link she draws between tidiness and figures such as «5% of children are depressed, 6 million take Ritalin» looks oversimplified.
The Turkish translation is fluent, but scan quality is poor and some pages are hard to read. The book refers to American family life in the 2000s and some examples may feel dated. Even so, its call to «understand your child» rather than «change your child», and its practical ideas, can help many parents — provided it is read with a critical eye.
- The four types are made memorable through animal metaphors (Penguin, Dog, Horse, Lion)
- Quizzes are provided for both parents and children
- The author's own childhood story humanises the subject
- Statistics are sourced, but the conclusions drawn are simplified
A more systematic, research-based approach to changing children's behaviour — reviewed on our site
Short, practical strategies for everyday parenting — reviewed on our site
In the section «Children Have Changed a Lot» Nakone lines up consumption statistics: consumption by 4–12-year-olds has tripled since 1990, the things in homes have grown by 50%, and $15 billion a year is spent on advertising aimed at children. Her observations on the «toy graveyards» in rooms and on school bags as heavy as airline luggage are familiar from everyday life.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.