Just Babies
Good Fit
- Readers looking for a scientifically grounded answer to whether human nature is fundamentally good or bad
- Anyone interested in developmental psychology, moral philosophy, or evolutionary biology
- Parents who want to understand when and how empathy and fairness develop in their own children
- Readers curious how classic texts like Adam Smith's "The Theory of Moral Sentiments" line up with modern scientific experiments
Not a Fit
- Readers looking for a purely philosophical (normative ethics) text with no interest in empirical psychology experiments
- Anyone committed to the view that morality is entirely learned/cultural and opposed in principle to biological/innate explanations
- Fast readers who tire of methodological detail (puppet experiments, infant behavior studies) and just want the bottom-line conclusions
Bloom opens the Preface with a sharp contrast — a real act of altruism in 2005 (Virginia Postrel donating a kidney to a stranger, Sally Satel) set against a news story he read the same morning about a man who threw acid in his ex-girlfriend's face. This contrast — humanity's capacity for both astonishing goodness and horrifying cruelty — frames the book's central question.
He then recounts the "Mary Bale" incident — a middle-aged woman in England caught on security camera dropping a stray cat into a trash bin, a video that went viral on Facebook and provoked such intense public rage that the woman required police protection. Bloom presents this as an example of how extreme our instinct to punish can become.
He surveys different ways of trying to understand morality — theology (NIH director Francis Collins treating acts of selflessness as evidence of God), literature and philosophy (the intuitions of novelists and poets, normative and metaethical approaches), and finally science, studying morality with the same methods used to study language or memory. Bloom explains that, as a developmental psychologist, his own focus is on how morality emerges in babies and young children.
Quoting Thomas Jefferson's 1787 letter — that the moral sense, like an arm or a leg, is part of a person, its strength varying from person to person but granted to everyone — and drawing on Adam Smith's "The Theory of Moral Sentiments" (a work Smith himself considered superior to "The Wealth of Nations"), Bloom promises that much of the book will show how these 18th-century ideas are confirmed by modern developmental-psychology experiments.
He lists four innate moral capacities: a moral sense (distinguishing well- from ill-intentioned acts), empathy and compassion, a rudimentary sense of fairness (a preference for equal division of resources), and a rudimentary sense of justice (wanting good acts rewarded and bad acts punished) — but stresses that this innate goodness is limited: indifference and hostility toward strangers, and a tendency toward bigotry and racism, are just as natural.
Chapter 1 opens with the now-famous experiment: a one-year-old watches a puppet show in which a "nice" puppet returns a ball while a "naughty" puppet runs off with it; when a reward is placed in front of each puppet, the baby predictably takes the naughty puppet's reward — but doesn't stop there, reaching over to hit the puppet on the head. Bloom presents this as evidence of a primitive urge to "enforce justice" that exists in babies before they can even speak.
- Bloom's prose is academically precise yet enlivened by personal confessions (admitting his own moral lapses) and everyday references (a Yoda quote, the Facebook incident)
- The book is a rare blend of hard science (puppet experiments) and philosophical tradition (Jefferson, Adam Smith)
- The author is a professor of psychology and cognitive science at Yale University; his research has appeared in journals like Nature and Science
A complementary work examining the innate aspects of human nature in a similarly scientific-philosophical register
Digs deeper into how moral intuitions function in group conflict
After Chapter 1, Bloom examines the developmental psychology of empathy and compassion (Chapter 2) and fairness, status, and punishment (Chapter 3), then shows in the "Others" chapter how in-group/out-group bias (racism, bigotry) emerges remarkably early in babies.
The following chapters turn to the body (the link between disgust and morality) and the role of family in moral development; the book closes with a final chapter, "How to Be Good," discussing how imagination, compassion, and intelligence let us transcend our innate moral limits.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.