Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

Romanov Riches

Solomon Volkov
Review by: Türkanə Əliyeva08 September 20261 min read
Russian-American musicologist Solomon Volkov's sweeping cultural history of 300 years of Romanov rule, tracing the complex, dramatic relationship between the dynasty and Russia's literature, painting, architecture, music, and ballet.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers interested in Russian cultural history, especially the relationship between power and artists
  • Anyone who wants to see figures like Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Tchaikovsky, and Pushkin in a broad historical context
  • Fans of academically rigorous nonfiction enriched with personal observation
Not a Fit
  • Readers looking for a narrow biography of a single ruler or artist
  • Those wanting a quick, light read — this is 368 pages of dense academic content
  • Readers with no prior familiarity with Russian history or culture (it assumes a lot of context)
How Readers Rate It
Pace 2.5/5 Average
Academic level 3.8/5 Academic
Reading difficulty 3.5/5 Average
46 voters
A 300-year dynasty that opens with an opera premiere
Covers the introduction and the opening of Chapter 1 (~15 pages, ~4% of the book) — Volkov's methodological introduction and the premiere of Glinka's opera; the remaining 14 chapters (from Pushkin to Dostoevsky to Tchaikovsky) are not covered.

The book doesn't open like a conventional history — it starts with the author's personal introduction. Volkov explains that this study picks up where his earlier book, "History of Twentieth-Century Russian Culture: From Tolstoy to Solzhenitsyn," left off, reaching back to 1613 (the Romanovs' ascension) — together, the two books cover the entire span of Russian cultural history from Archpriest Avvakum to the present.

Volkov rejects the common view that the Romanovs showed a "striking indifference" to the arts. On the contrary, he argues that while the dynasty's male members were career soldiers, they were also deeply engaged with literature, architecture, music, and painting — Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, and Nicholas I even took a direct hand in shaping culture. His central thesis: the more tightly a ruler controlled the cultural process, the more stable the regime.

The author illustrates this personal dimension with concrete examples: Nicholas I called Pushkin "the smartest man in Russia" and tried (not always successfully) to steer his work; Alexander II's decision to abolish serfdom is said to have been emotionally influenced by Turgenev's A Sportsman's Sketches; Alexander III eagerly read Dostoevsky, admired Tchaikovsky's music, and collected works by the Peredvizhniki (Wanderers) painters he championed as authentically national artists.

Volkov takes a methodologically distinctive approach — grounding the book not just in archival sources but in his own lived experience. He recalls a chance encounter with Khrushchev on a Leningrad street in 1964 as a 20-year-old conservatory student, and later, while living in the US, being able to "look into the eyes" of Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Putin during their visits to New York — experiences he says helped him understand the relationship between power and culture as one between living, flawed people rather than cardboard "geniuses."

The main text opens on November 21, 1836, at the premiere of Mikhail Glinka's opera A Life for the Tsar at St. Petersburg's Bolshoi Kamenny Theatre — described as a major cultural event, held in one of the era's most prestigious buildings, with tickets sold out a month in advance despite the high price. Volkov chooses this scene as the symbolic starting point of the dynasty-culture relationship.

The author's style is notably academic yet vivid — archival documents, diaries, and personal conversations (including his own encounters with Akhmatova, Shostakovich, Balanchine, and Brodsky) are woven together with scholarly rigor but without dryness.

Reading Experience
  • The author blends academic fact with his own personal encounters, presenting history as made by living people rather than cardboard figures
  • Each chapter opens with a concrete cultural event/performance before widening into broader historical context
If You Liked This
History of Twentieth-Century Russian CultureSolomon Volkov

The same author's earlier book, picking up where this one leaves off (1917)

Natasha's DanceOrlando Figes

A similarly broad, synthesizing approach to Russian cultural history

Spoiler
What does the rest of the book cover?
⚠️ The general structure is revealed based on chapter titles, no specific analysis details.

The book proceeds chronologically — from Peter the Great through Catherine the Great's era, then Karamzin and Zhukovsky under Paul I/Alexander I, the rise of Pushkin, Lermontov and Bryullov, and Gogol.

The middle section is devoted to Turgenev and Dostoevsky under Alexander II, Tolstoy and the woman question, and Tchaikovsky and homosexuality in Imperial Russia.

The final chapters cover Dostoevsky's relationship with the Romanovs, the Peredvizhniki painters and Mussorgsky under Alexander III, and finally the era of Nicholas II and Lenin — leading up to the dynasty's collapse.

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
A powerful work of documentary journalism that tells the attack of 11 September 2001 not through politics but from inside the World Trade Center, through the eyes of the people there. The New York Times reporters drew on interviews with survivors, thousands of pages of radio and phone transcripts and emails, and every detail is sourced. The book records not only the tragedy but also the questions: why the buildings were built as they were, and why rescuers could not hear one another. A heavy but important read.
4.5 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
102 Minutes

102 Minutes

Jim Dwyer, Kevin Flynn · Non-fiction
Reviews
Cemal Duruk's short book examining the question «Was Socrates a prophet?» by comparing it with the concept of prophethood in the Islamic, Jewish and Christian traditions. In the first chapter that was read the concept of prophethood is explained in plain language: the difference between nabi and rasul and five common qualities (sidq, amanah, fatanah, ismah, tabligh) are illustrated with verses and hadiths. The chapter is written from a faith-based perspective and is not a study in the history of philosophy; this is both its strength (systematic exposition) and its limitation. Interesting for those who want to read about the concept of prophethood in plain exposition with a comparative religious perspective.
2.9 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
Was Socrates a Prophet?

Was Socrates a Prophet?

Cemal Duruk · Non-fiction
Reviews
A simple, repetitive self-help book with some dated examples, but genuinely practical ideas underneath.
4.0 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
Million Dollar Habits

Million Dollar Habits

Brian Tracy · Non-fiction
Reviews
A collection of short pieces for parents by Asiye Türkan, a family counsellor and mother of three living in Germany: the irony in the title — that the one not listening is often the parent, not the child — is the book's best idea, and there is sincere, useful advice on the harm of shouting and hitting and on «I-messages», but some claims rest on pseudoscientific sources and the judgements about working parents and nurseries are one-sided.
3.0 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
Mothers Who Don’t Listen

Mothers Who Don’t Listen

Asiye Türkan · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text