Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Novel

Mamluk: From Slavery to Sultanate

Sıtkı Öztürk
Review by: İdris Muxtarzadə07 September 20261 min read
A fast-paced, blood-soaked historical novel tracing the road from the fall of Baghdad to the birth of the Mamluk sultanate, told through the fate of enslaved children.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers interested in the Mongol invasions and Mamluk history
  • Fans of fast-paced, battle-driven historical fiction
  • Anyone seeking the story of legendary Turkic commanders like Baybars
  • Readers who enjoy fictionalized dramatizations of real historical events (the fall of Baghdad)
Not a Fit
  • Readers sensitive to graphic violence and massacre scenes
  • Those expecting slow, detailed historical analysis — the book prioritizes action
  • Readers who can't tolerate fictional embellishment when historical accuracy matters most to them
  • Those who enjoy long, dialogue-free description — this book is dialogue-heavy
How Readers Rate It
Pace 3.8/5 Fast
Language difficulty 2.4/5 Average
Violence 3.9/5 High
Historical fidelity 3.2/5 Average
52 voters
The ashes of Baghdad, the fate of Cairo
Covers the Prologue (the fall of Baghdad, 1258) and the opening of Part I (~24 pages, ≈6%); the rest is not revealed. · for the spoiler book pp. 275–290 (Aktay's murder) and pp. 365–410 (Kutuz made sultan, Ayn Jalut, the ending and the epilogue) were read

The novel opens in February 1258 with the destruction of Baghdad by Hulagu Khan's Mongol army. The opening is brutal: the khan rides his horse up the palace's marble staircase, takes Caliph Abdullah al-Musta'sim and his sons captive, and within hours the city becomes a 'field of corpses.'

In the balcony scene, Hulagu Khan forces the broken caliph to look out over the ruined city and accuses him: 'You are the murderer of this people. Your arrogance burned them.' This opens one of the book's central emotional poles — the responsibility of power.

One of the most striking episodes is Nasir al-Din al-Tusi's revenge: the scholar, humiliated years earlier by the caliph (told he should have brought 'a pair of oxen' instead of his book), now returns as Hulagu's most trusted advisor — his line 'I brought you the oxen you wanted' revives a real historical anecdote.

The execution of the caliph's family is depicted as a ritual — commanders and the caliph's sons are laid on logs and executed, while the caliph himself is wrapped in a carpet and killed so that 'the blood of the Prophet's line does not touch the earth.' This signals from the very first pages that the book does not shy away from violence.

With a sharp cut, the story jumps to March 1249, Cairo (Fustat) — nine years before the fall of Baghdad. Two children, Hüseyin and Selma, accused of theft, flee through the city's narrow streets, chased by an angry crowd.

As he runs, Hüseyin collides with a young warrior — the book's protagonist, Baybars. When someone in the crowd insults him as a 'filthy Turk,' the words recall Baybars's own past: a childhood born on the Kipchak steppes, torn from his family during the Mongol invasion, and sold into slavery.

In parallel, the chapter also introduces Baybars's future comrade Seyf al-Din Qutuz — it's implied the two have known each other since childhood, bound by both friendship and rivalry. With this, the author begins building the book's core structure: the parallel paths of two future sultans, from slavery to the throne.

Reading Experience
  • Short, sharp sentences and cinematic scene transitions create a fast pace.
  • Real historical events (the fall of Baghdad, the Nasir al-Din al-Tusi legend) are woven together with fictional characters (Hüseyin, Selma).
  • Hard cuts marked by "***" between sections evoke film editing.
  • Dialogue density is high; description is deliberately kept short.
Content Warning
Graphic violence and mass-killing scenes (depiction of the fall of Baghdad)Themes of slave trading and violence against children
If You Liked This
The Epic of Baybars (Sirat al-Zahir Baybars)Traditional Arabic folk epic

The original folk-epic source dramatizing Baybars's own life as legend

Gazi Han OsmanSıtkı Öztürk

The same author's similarly-styled historical novel set in a different era (Osman Gazi)

Holy WarSıtkı Öztürk

Another battle-driven historical novel by the same author, in the same fast-paced style

Spoiler
The ending — Aktay's murder, Ayn Jalut and Baybars's reckoning with Kutuz
⚠️ The rest of the novel and its ending are revealed. Don't open it if you'd rather discover it yourself

Short answer: in the novel Baybars and Kutuz defeat the Mongols together at Ayn Jalut, but afterwards, during a hunt, Baybars fights Kutuz in a duel and Kutuz dies. The root of this reckoning is Fariseddin Aktay, killed years earlier by Kutuz's own hand.

In 1254 the Egyptian sultan Aybek intercepts a letter written to Aktay in the name of an-Nasir Salah ad-Din Yusuf and summons him to the Citadel palace. Aktay says the letter is forged; Aybek first lets him go, then orders «Finish him!». Kutuz has a sword handed to Aktay, duels him and kills him, then throws the severed head down from the fortress wall at the feet of Baybars's horse. Baybars cries «I will not let this go!» and leaves Egypt with a hundred men, while Kutuz dismisses the emirs seen as supporters of Aktay and Baybars on Roda Island.

In 1259, after Hülegü takes Baghdad, an-Nasir Salah ad-Din Yusuf wavers; when Baybars asks him for three thousand cavalry to defend Aleppo he is refused and storms out. In Egypt the emirs choose Kutuz as sultan instead of the child sultan. Kutuz sends a call even to his former enemies; it reaches Baybars through Hüseyin and Halis (called Aksungur and Akdoğan, the names Kutuz gave them), and Baybars comes back. Kutuz kills Hülegü's envoys with his own sword; on 3 September 1260 at Ayn Jalut Baybars commands the vanguard, Kutuz and Aktay al-Mustarib join the charge, and Hüseyin kills the Mongol commander Ketbuqa Noyan. Kutuz enters Damascus in triumph; Hülegü executes an-Nasir Salah ad-Din Yusuf with his own hand.

On the way back to Egypt, at al-Qusayr, Kutuz rewards the emirs for the victory but Baybars's name is almost never mentioned; Baybars points out that Aktay too was forgotten. The next day, in a hunting contest, Baybars shoots an arrow into Kutuz's right shoulder and says «Our agreement is over!». In the duel that follows, in front of the Azizis and Hüseyin and Halis, a worn-out, wounded Kutuz stops instead of parrying the blow, a sword goes into his chest, and he falls dead. Baybars looks at the body and is saddened.

The last scene of the novel takes place a year later in Söğüt, on the Byzantine border: Gündüz Alp, son of the Kayı chief Ertuğrul, who has been cornered while hunting, meets a young man in ragged clothes who helps him; the young man introduces himself as Aksungur. A note at the end of the book says that, despite the Kutuz affair, Baybars became Mamluk sultan with the support of Aktay al-Mustarib and Kalawun, and ruled for 17 years.

Coverage. The review covers only the Prologue (the fall of Baghdad, 1258) and the opening of Part I (~24 pages, ≈6%); the rest is not revealed. The spoiler section below is based on the text actually read from later parts of the novel (pp. 275–290 and 365–410). The book is published only in Turkish.



Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 3
O
Orkhan Valiyev
3 days ago

The fall of Baghdad scene shook me from page one — more gripping than any history textbook.

S
Shabnam Rzayeva
1 week ago

I didn't know who Baybars was — this book made me want to read more about him.

T
Tural Ismayilov
2 weeks ago

The battle scenes are fast and bloody — not for the faint of heart.

Similar Books
Reviews
A detailed account of the nine Enneagram temperament types by an author who has worked with the model in Turkey since 1991. The type portraits are thorough and often recognisable — it is interesting to see yourself and others in them. But although the book presents itself as science, its core claims — that temperament is innate, can be precisely identified in the first year of life and never changes — are not backed by evidence. The Enneagram's scientific validity is disputed, and the final sections drift from psychology into spiritual-philosophical interpretation.
3.0 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
The DNA of Personality

The DNA of Personality

İsmail Acarkan · Non-fiction
Reviews
A colourful short introduction to Japan's native religion: it retells the Kojiki and Nihongi myths, the concept of kami, shrine rituals and the Ise pilgrimage readably, but more than a third of the book is an alphabetical glossary, some mythological details are wrong, and the text reads like a compilation of Turkish history-of-religion textbooks.
3.0 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
Shinto — Spirits of the Ancestors

Shinto — Spirits of the Ancestors

Robby Silver · Non-fiction
Reviews
The book explains the course of England and other states as the plan of a secret network (the Illuminati, the Masons, the «bankers») with the thesis «nothing in history is coincidence». In the first section that was read, the strongest side is that factual information on English history (Walpole, the industrial revolution) is given briefly and clearly and that there are many footnotes. The weak side is that the main claims rest on probability and coincidence rather than proof and that the claims about the Rothschild family repeat an antisemitic conspiracy theory with a long tradition, which is not confirmed by historical sources. This book should be read not as a history book but as an example of conspiracy theory.
1.8 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
Tanık: Küresel Entrikalar ve Komplolar

Tanık: Küresel Entrikalar ve Komplolar

Cemal Duruk · Non-fiction
Reviews
From the Cheka's birth in 1917 to the collapse of the Soviet Union, a meticulously documented yet page-turning popular history of seventy years of Soviet secret police, by French journalist-historian Bernard Lecomte.
4.4 / 5
ReviewsCavid Mehdiyev
The History of the KGB

The History of the KGB

Bernard Lecomte · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text