Turks Through Russian Eyes
Good Fit
- Readers who want to learn the history of Turkish-Russian relations and the origin of the image of the «other»
- Anyone interested in the Kipchaks, the Pechenegs, the Golden Horde and Kievan Rus
- Readers who like to look at history in the language of the sources (chronicle, envoy's report, poem)
Not a Fit
- Readers who want flowing, footnote-free, simple history that reads like a novel
- Readers who want to read the Russian side's view outside the author's account: the book is a Turkish historian's view
- Anyone looking only for the Ottoman-Russian wars: the part read belongs to a much earlier period
In the foreword, the author writes that the history of Turkish-Russian relations is far older than the often-quoted 90 years (the Moscow treaty) or 500 years (the Ottoman-Russian contacts). When the Slavs came onto the stage of history they lived alongside the Avars, the Khazars, and then the Pechenegs, the Kipchaks and the Volga Bulgars, and fought many wars. The annals (letopis) that the Russians wrote in monasteries after adopting Christianity are the first records, and they depict the Turkic tribes negatively: the author finds this natural, because it is the portrait of the «other», that is, the enemy.
The author counts the 2.5 centuries of Golden Horde rule over Russia as the most negative period in Russian views of the Turks, and says Russian school textbooks almost ignore it. Although the Ottoman-Russian wars lasted less than 50 years in total, they shaped the image of the Turks among later generations. By depicting the Turkic peoples as «barbarians», the Russians tried to justify their expansion: in their view, they were bringing «civilization» to those lands.
On sources, the author says Russian chronicles, envoys' reports, memoirs of statesmen, soldiers' memoirs, consular and intelligence reports, literary works and writings of Russian intellectuals were used. The book also gives a short history of Turkish-Russian relations. The author admits that it is impossible to see all sources, that there are hundreds of thousands of Russian sources on the Turks, and says several important sources were chosen from each period.
Chapter one begins with the Avars. The chronicle describes how the Avars oppressed the Slavs, and the saying «they died like the Avars, leaving neither offspring nor heirs». That Slav tribes such as the Polyane paid tribute to the Khazars, giving one sword per household, is shown by a chronicle quotation. The unification of the Eastern Slavs by the Normans (Varangians) and the birth of the name «Rus» are explained, and the author writes that relations with Turkic tribes make up much of the history of Kievan Rus.
The Pechenegs are those who killed the first Russian prince in Russian history: Prince Svyatoslav was attacked in 973 on his return from a Balkan campaign, and the Pecheneg ruler Kürya covered his skull in gold and made it a drinking cup. The Pechenegs moved away from the Russian border after 1036, and the author recalls Akdes Nimet Kurat's view that the reason was the arrival of the Uzes. Pushkin's «Ruslan and Lyudmila» describes the Pecheneg campaign against Kiev. The Uzes are settled on the Russian border as «Torks», Berendeys and «Black Hoods».
The Kipchaks launched 50 large campaigns on Russian lands between 1061 and 1210 and became one of the causes of the fall of Kievan Rus. The chronicles call them «base, godless» and explain their raids as God's punishment. Prince Igor's campaign of 1185 ended in defeat, Igor was taken prisoner, and this campaign became the subject of the best-known Russian epic, «The Tale of Igor's Campaign». At the end of the section comes the story of 986, when the Volga Bulgars proposed that Prince Vladimir adopt Islam and Vladimir refused, saying «in Rus we cannot live without drink and merriment».
- Sources: direct quotations from Russian chronicles (Voskresenskaya, Ipatiev, Laurentian)
- Combining historical events with literary texts such as Pushkin and «The Tale of Igor's Campaign»
- Extensive references to Russian and Turkish researchers in footnotes at the end of each page
- Short sections divided by topic (Pechenegs, Kipchaks, the religious factor)
- A bibliography (p. 201) and an index (p. 215) at the end make the cited sources easy to reach
The author's other book on the history of the Volga Bulgars, the Mongols and the Golden Horde
A collected volume on the Golden Horde and the age of the Chinggisids
The classic history of Russia cited many times in the book
The most interesting conclusion of part one is a paradox: although the chronicles call the Kipchaks «base», Russian princes married their khans' daughters. Vsevolod I, son of Yaroslav the Wise, married the daughter of a Kipchak khan, Svyatopolk II married the daughter of Khan Togor in 1094, the sons of Monomakh, including Yuri Dolgorukiy, also married daughters of Kipchak khans, and Yuri Dolgorukiy had 11 children from this marriage. The author writes that such marriages aimed both at political and military support and at kinship with the stronger Turkic lineage.
The continuation of this line is also interesting: the son of Prince Svyatoslav, who married the daughter of the Kipchak Khan Aep, was Igor, the hero of the first Russian epic. In other words, the famous Russian hero was half Kipchak. The grandchildren of these princes later became Grand Princes of Moscow and ruled until the end of the sixteenth century. In 1223 the Russians and the Kipchaks formed an alliance against the Mongols: the Kipchak prince Kotyan told the Russian princes «today they took our lands, tomorrow they will take yours». The united army was defeated on the Kalka River. The chronicles, for their part, depict the Mongols as a force sent by God to punish the Kipchaks.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.