Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

Turks Through Russian Eyes

In English: Turks Through Russian Eyes (Rusların Gözüyle Türkler)
İlyas Kemaloğlu
Review by: Rafel Əlizadə07 October 20261 min read
A source-based history book that follows how Russians looked at Turks over more than a thousand years through Russian chronicles, envoys' reports, memoirs and literature. Its strongest quality is showing how the image of the «enemy» arose from the Kipchak and Golden Horde wars and, at the same time, that princes married daughters of Kipchak khans. Its weakness is the density of an academic text, many footnotes and a few dated terms (such as «race»).
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers who want to learn the history of Turkish-Russian relations and the origin of the image of the «other»
  • Anyone interested in the Kipchaks, the Pechenegs, the Golden Horde and Kievan Rus
  • Readers who like to look at history in the language of the sources (chronicle, envoy's report, poem)
Not a Fit
  • Readers who want flowing, footnote-free, simple history that reads like a novel
  • Readers who want to read the Russian side's view outside the author's account: the book is a Turkish historian's view
  • Anyone looking only for the Ottoman-Russian wars: the part read belongs to a much earlier period
How Readers Rate It
Readability 3.4/5 Average
Depth 3.7/5 Deep
Density of sources 4.4/5 High
40 voters
Foreword and part one: «The Beginning of Turkish-Russian Relations and First Impressions of the Turks»
Read: the foreword and the whole of part one (pp. 9–29): the Slavs under Avar and Khazar rule, the Pechenegs, the Kipchaks, princes marrying daughters of Kipchak khans and the role of religion (the Volga Bulgars). That is about 10% of the book.

In the foreword, the author writes that the history of Turkish-Russian relations is far older than the often-quoted 90 years (the Moscow treaty) or 500 years (the Ottoman-Russian contacts). When the Slavs came onto the stage of history they lived alongside the Avars, the Khazars, and then the Pechenegs, the Kipchaks and the Volga Bulgars, and fought many wars. The annals (letopis) that the Russians wrote in monasteries after adopting Christianity are the first records, and they depict the Turkic tribes negatively: the author finds this natural, because it is the portrait of the «other», that is, the enemy.

The author counts the 2.5 centuries of Golden Horde rule over Russia as the most negative period in Russian views of the Turks, and says Russian school textbooks almost ignore it. Although the Ottoman-Russian wars lasted less than 50 years in total, they shaped the image of the Turks among later generations. By depicting the Turkic peoples as «barbarians», the Russians tried to justify their expansion: in their view, they were bringing «civilization» to those lands.

On sources, the author says Russian chronicles, envoys' reports, memoirs of statesmen, soldiers' memoirs, consular and intelligence reports, literary works and writings of Russian intellectuals were used. The book also gives a short history of Turkish-Russian relations. The author admits that it is impossible to see all sources, that there are hundreds of thousands of Russian sources on the Turks, and says several important sources were chosen from each period.

Chapter one begins with the Avars. The chronicle describes how the Avars oppressed the Slavs, and the saying «they died like the Avars, leaving neither offspring nor heirs». That Slav tribes such as the Polyane paid tribute to the Khazars, giving one sword per household, is shown by a chronicle quotation. The unification of the Eastern Slavs by the Normans (Varangians) and the birth of the name «Rus» are explained, and the author writes that relations with Turkic tribes make up much of the history of Kievan Rus.

The Pechenegs are those who killed the first Russian prince in Russian history: Prince Svyatoslav was attacked in 973 on his return from a Balkan campaign, and the Pecheneg ruler Kürya covered his skull in gold and made it a drinking cup. The Pechenegs moved away from the Russian border after 1036, and the author recalls Akdes Nimet Kurat's view that the reason was the arrival of the Uzes. Pushkin's «Ruslan and Lyudmila» describes the Pecheneg campaign against Kiev. The Uzes are settled on the Russian border as «Torks», Berendeys and «Black Hoods».

The Kipchaks launched 50 large campaigns on Russian lands between 1061 and 1210 and became one of the causes of the fall of Kievan Rus. The chronicles call them «base, godless» and explain their raids as God's punishment. Prince Igor's campaign of 1185 ended in defeat, Igor was taken prisoner, and this campaign became the subject of the best-known Russian epic, «The Tale of Igor's Campaign». At the end of the section comes the story of 986, when the Volga Bulgars proposed that Prince Vladimir adopt Islam and Vladimir refused, saying «in Rus we cannot live without drink and merriment».

Reading Experience
  • Sources: direct quotations from Russian chronicles (Voskresenskaya, Ipatiev, Laurentian)
  • Combining historical events with literary texts such as Pushkin and «The Tale of Igor's Campaign»
  • Extensive references to Russian and Turkish researchers in footnotes at the end of each page
  • Short sections divided by topic (Pechenegs, Kipchaks, the religious factor)
  • A bibliography (p. 201) and an index (p. 215) at the end make the cited sources easy to reach
Content Warning
The book is a Turkish historian's view and analyses the negative image in Russian sources at length; Russian researchers' views are not given separatelyDated terms such as «race» and «Turan» are sometimes usedQuotations from the chronicles contain insulting descriptions of Turks and Muslims (for example «eat carrion», «base»)The chronicle's account of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad may be sensitive for Muslim readers
If You Liked This
Tatar Tarihiİlyas Kemaloğlu

The author's other book on the history of the Volga Bulgars, the Mongols and the Golden Horde

Avrasya'nın Sekiz Asrı: ÇengizoğullarıH. Alan, İ. Kemaloğlu (eds.)

A collected volume on the Golden Horde and the age of the Chinggisids

Başlangıçtan 1917'ye Kadar Rusya TarihiAkdes Nimet Kurat

The classic history of Russia cited many times in the book

Spoiler
Enemy and father-in-law at once: princes and Kipchak khans
⚠️ The paradox of part one: war and marriage.

The most interesting conclusion of part one is a paradox: although the chronicles call the Kipchaks «base», Russian princes married their khans' daughters. Vsevolod I, son of Yaroslav the Wise, married the daughter of a Kipchak khan, Svyatopolk II married the daughter of Khan Togor in 1094, the sons of Monomakh, including Yuri Dolgorukiy, also married daughters of Kipchak khans, and Yuri Dolgorukiy had 11 children from this marriage. The author writes that such marriages aimed both at political and military support and at kinship with the stronger Turkic lineage.

The continuation of this line is also interesting: the son of Prince Svyatoslav, who married the daughter of the Kipchak Khan Aep, was Igor, the hero of the first Russian epic. In other words, the famous Russian hero was half Kipchak. The grandchildren of these princes later became Grand Princes of Moscow and ruled until the end of the sixteenth century. In 1223 the Russians and the Kipchaks formed an alliance against the Mongols: the Kipchak prince Kotyan told the Russian princes «today they took our lands, tomorrow they will take yours». The united army was defeated on the Kalka River. The chronicles, for their part, depict the Mongols as a force sent by God to punish the Kipchaks.

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
The sequel to «Mahi» continues the past timeline: Mahi and Ali Asaf are now together, but a sudden attack, hidden relationships and Ali Asaf's dangerous profession cast a shadow over their happiness. Bahar and Selim's parallel love story and the family scenes bring the novel to life; but the first book's weaknesses — long inner monologues, repeated gestures — remain, and romantic scenes take up even more space.
3.2 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
Mahi 2

Mahi 2

Tuğba Atıcı Coşar · Novel
Reviews
The Turkish edition of a classic US textbook on adolescent psychology: it presents every topic, from physical development to morality and from family to substance use, together with theory, research and critique; the chapter on moral development explains the Piaget–Kohlberg–Gilligan line fairly and clearly, but the book is US-centred and relies on 2008 data.
4.0 / 5
ReviewsCavid Mehdiyev
The Adolescent: Development, Relationships, and Culture

The Adolescent: Development, Relationships, and Culture

Kim Gale Dolgin · Non-fiction
Reviews
A memoir following the life of Emel Taşçıoğlu (born Emel Güney) in interview form, from her Ankara childhood to a musician family, from the first stage to the TRT period. In the first sections that were read, the strongest side is the warm, detailed description of the old Hamamönü quarter, the culture of neighbourliness and the türkü atmosphere at home. The weak side is the lack of documented historical research and the subjectivity of the memoir voice in some places. A warm and simply written read for those interested in Turkish folk music and the Ankara of the last century.
3.9 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
My Folk Song — The Emel Taşçıoğlu Book

My Folk Song — The Emel Taşçıoğlu Book

Hatice İkinci · Non-fiction
Reviews
A Pulitzer Prize-winning classic that tells the history of oil from the 1850s to the Gulf War as a power struggle between entrepreneurs, companies and states — encyclopedic in scope, yet it reads like a novel.
4.7 / 5
ReviewsAytən Həsənova
The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power

The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power

Daniel Yergin · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text