Kitabda Nə Var? Kitabda Nə Var?
Appearance
Join Us
What's in the Book? Discussion About Us
Azərbaycan English ✓ Русский Türkçe
← Reviews
Non-fiction

Dictionary of Gestures

François Caradec
Review by: İdris Muxtarzadə01 October 20261 min read
This is not a «read body language and see through people» book. It is a dictionary born of thirty years of collecting by the French writer and lexicographer Caradec, listing about 850 deliberate gestures from head to toe. Each gesture is drawn and given with its meaning, where it is used and sometimes a literary quotation. It's a reference book to browse with curiosity, often amusing, and good at showing cross-cultural misunderstandings. Its weaknesses: it is heavily French-centred, has few Eastern gestures, and is meant for dipping into rather than reading cover to cover.
Who Is This Book For?
Good Fit
  • Readers curious about language, culture and semiotics
  • Travellers and people working abroad who want to avoid misread gestures
  • Writers, actors and illustrators who want to describe a character's gestures precisely
Not a Fit
  • Anyone looking for a practical guide to «reading» people in meetings or dates
  • Readers who want to read a book straight through like a novel
  • Those expecting a focus on Turkish or Caucasian gestures
How Readers Rate It
Readability 3.6/5 Easy
Practical value 2.8/5 Average
Interest 3.9/5 High
40 voters
Introduction: «For the Beauty of Gesture» and the first chapters
Read: the roughly 35-page introduction, the head and ear chapters, the «V» sign from the index-finger chapter and the final chapter (foot) — about 25% of the book; other entries browsed selectively.

Caradec draws the boundaries clearly: the dictionary covers only gestures people make deliberately to communicate with others. Involuntary movements — «tics» — are happily left to psychologists. Specialised coded systems such as referees' signals, sign language and stock-exchange hand signals are excluded too. That matters for understanding the book: there's no pop psychology of the «liars touch their nose» kind here — it is a cultural dictionary.

The central thesis is simple: «there is no universal gesture». The first example sticks: the «O» made with index finger and thumb means «OK» in the US but is a serious insult in some Arab countries. Western manners require you to look the person you're speaking to in the eye; in Asia and Africa you must not stare at someone you respect. Even counting differs: Europeans start with the thumb, Americans with the index finger, and for the Japanese the thumb is five.

The introduction is also a lovely tour of the history of gesture. In 1832 Andrea de Jorio tried to prove that Neapolitan gestures could be seen on ancient vases and paintings; as Caradec drily notes, de Jorio at least proved that Neapolitan gestures hadn't changed in 170 years. Caradec quotes at length the silent gestural «duel» between Rabelais's Panurge and the English scholar Thaumaste, saying French literature has no other dialogue built from gestures at such length. Kafka's diary entry about an accident described entirely with the hands, and Queneau's terse «(silence) (gesture)» notes, are here too.

One of the most entertaining parts is Georges Polti's arithmetic: Polti counts the possible movements of each part of the body and arrives at more than eight million combinations for a single hand. Then come the gestures of orators, preachers and actors: Areopagus judges preferring to hear orators in the dark so as not to be swayed, a long verse lesson in gesture for 18th-century preachers, and a list of 31 «oratorical postures».

The dictionary entries are short and precise. Tossing the head sharply back means «no» in most Arab countries, Turkey, Malta and Sicily, and is called the «Greek no»; in parts of north-east Africa the same movement means «yes». Tugging the ear is recorded in Turkey as a luck gesture, like knocking on wood, while pulling the earlobe is a «watch yourself» threat in Turkey and Greece.

Its weakness is its limits. The author admits that, without the budget for research trips, the book couldn't cover international gestures fully and mostly relies on the sources in its bibliography. The result is mainly a catalogue of French and Mediterranean gestures. Some entries are also crude or obscene gestures, described frankly. That's not a flaw, but readers should know.

Reading Experience
  • A simple, clear drawing for every gesture
  • Rich quotations from literature and history
  • A convenient head-to-toe structure with a subject index
Content Warning
Frank descriptions of some obscene gesturesA long passage of crude humour from RabelaisNo heavy themes
If You Liked This
Gestures: Their Origins and DistributionDesmond Morris et al.

The classic study of how European gestures are distributed geographically

BodytalkDesmond Morris

An illustrated dictionary of gestures around the world

The Definitive Book of Body LanguageAllan Pease, Barbara Pease

A practical guide to reading body language — a different approach

Spoiler
How does this part end?
⚠️ The «V» sign: Churchill and Laveleye

The index-finger chapter tells the story of the «V» sign: Belgian lawyer Victor de Laveleye proposed it on 14 January 1941 as a symbol of resistance to the Nazis, Winston Churchill adopted it, and it spread worldwide. The same gesture with the palm facing yourself is a grave insult in England — a difference Churchill knew well. The insult's origin is unknown; it is thought to come from a threatening gesture by English archers.

The dictionary ends with the foot chapter. The Pope washing and kissing the feet of chosen poor people during Holy Week is listed as a gesture of humility. The last entries are the standing ovation, the stadium «Mexican wave» and kicking an opponent from behind. The book closes this last entry with a sardonic quotation from Léon Bloy, followed by the bibliography and index.

Responsibility. This review reflects the personal assessment of its author, who is responsible for it. As a platform, "What's in the Book?" is not responsible for the content of the review. All rights to the work belong to its author and publisher; the cover image is used for promotional purposes only.

If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.
How Would You Rate It?
Did this review help you decide?
Reviews · 0
Similar Books
Reviews
The first novel by the author of “The Jungle Book” — a dark, strange and uneven book about art, fame, male friendship and unrequited love. Its strongest pages are the battle scenes in the Sudanese desert and the friendship between the painter Dick Heldar and the correspondent Torpenhow: Kipling writes what he saw as a journalist with vividness and grit. The weak side: Maisie remains cold and one-dimensional, the judgements about women painters sound dated and prejudiced today, and the plot moves slowly in the first half. The Turkish edition was marketed as “Waiting for You”. Interesting for readers who want to see a lesser-known side of Kipling, but not a recommended first Kipling.
3.7 / 5
ReviewsTürkanə Əliyeva
The Light That Failed

The Light That Failed

Rudyard Kipling · Classics
Reviews
A thematic introduction to large-scale world history from Kevin Reilly, founding president of the World History Association — the book opens with the Big Bang itself, races through cosmic and geological history up to the emergence of the human species, then gradually shifts into the great turning points of cultural history. A rare book that pairs academic rigor with genuinely accessible storytelling.
4.5 / 5
ReviewsRafel Əlizadə
The Human Journey: A Concise Introduction to World History

The Human Journey: A Concise Introduction to World History

Kevin Reilly · Non-fiction
Reviews
Written in the aftermath of a personal crisis (a mother's death and the collapse of a marriage) and famously called "the book I hate most" by Christie, this Poirot novel nonetheless delivers every ingredient of the classic "murder aboard a train" formula: a mysterious jewel, a thief in disguise, an unexpected killer.
3.9 / 5
ReviewsCavid Mehdiyev
The Mystery of the Blue Train

The Mystery of the Blue Train

Agatha Christie · Classics
Reviews
A self-help book by a well-known social-media author on relationships, the subconscious and ancestral energy, resting on personal experience, astrology and «the power of thought». Its strongest points are the suggestions on communication, gratitude, forgiveness and watching one's own words, which push the reader to see that their relationship pattern comes from the family. Its weaknesses are claims with no scientific basis (the influence of planets, a subconscious cause of illness, ancestral «burden») and repetition.
2.9 / 5
Reviewsİdris Muxtarzadə
Ruh Eşin Nerede?

Ruh Eşin Nerede?

Can Aydoğmuş · Non-fiction
Esc — close · ↵ — open
Text