Embracing Alienation
Good Fit
- Readers interested in continental philosophy, psychoanalysis and critical theory
- Those who have read Žižek, Lacan or Hegel and want to follow that line further
- Sceptics of self-help clichés like «find yourself» or «return to your true self»
- Anyone seeking a new angle on identity politics and the critique of capitalism
Not a Fit
- Readers expecting practical life advice — this is a purely theoretical essay
- Those unfamiliar with philosophical terms such as subject, symbolic order and the unconscious
- Readers bothered by poor print quality — the Turkish copy we reviewed has many scanning errors
McGowan opens with humour: nobody has ever said to their friends, «let's get alienated»; alienation seems to have nothing in common with pleasures like eating pizza, playing tennis or falling in love, and is seen as something to avoid. The left tradition descending from Marx also conceives political action as a struggle against alienation. The author's claim is radical: this negative view misses alienation's emancipatory character.
The central thesis is stated clearly: alienation is not a departure from a «true self» we once had and then lost. It is primary — we are alienated from the moment we emerge as subjects until we die, and its only «cure» is death. It is precisely this inner distance — our failure to coincide with ourselves — that frees us from the conditions of our birth and from biological and social determination. His examples: someone raised as an ardent capitalist in the Midwest can become a Marxist; someone pressured to «be a man» can become feminine.
McGowan grounds the idea in Freud's unconscious. The unconscious drives us to act against our own interests: someone afraid of heart disease eats doughnuts instead of broccoli, someone who wants a healthy relationship chooses a partner who brings only pain. We usually see this as an absence of freedom; the author argues the opposite — it is exactly because the unconscious escapes conscious control that it breaks the chain of determination and opens an alternative possibility. «We are free because we are divided within ourselves.»
The most memorable part of the introduction is the example of names. No child chooses its own name; a name is an «act of violence» imposed by parents or other adults, loading the child with a destiny. In a footnote McGowan recounts how his mother claimed to have let him «choose» his name by drawing slips of paper from a hat — and shows that even this does not abolish alienation, since the adults wrote the slips. The very sentence «My name is Todd» betrays the gap between speaker and name.
At the start of Chapter 1 the author sets out the key distinction between subject and identity: identity is made of social positions — job, family status, religion, politics, ethnicity — while the subject never fully coincides with any of them. That «failure» is subjectivity itself. From here opens a critique of identity politics and of consumer culture's offer of «identities for sale».
McGowan's ideas are genuinely refreshing and offer a strong philosophical reply to the self-help industry's promise of finding your «real self». But the text is dense with Hegel, Lacan, Sartre and Fanon and written in academic language that may tire a non-specialist.
- Abstract ideas are explained through everyday examples (naming, eating doughnuts, clashing with the boss)
- Extensive footnotes engage in dialogue with Hegel, Sartre, Žižek and Russell
- The argument advances step by step, applied in each chapter to a new domain (modernity, capitalism, the public)
In the same Hegel–Lacan line, placing the subject's inner division at the centre — reviewed on our site
Critical texts on how modern society constructs «normal» and «abnormal» identities — reviewed on our site
At the start of the first chapter the author sets out the central distinction between subject and identity: identity consists of social positions such as work, family, religion, political view and ethnic belonging, while the subject never coincides fully with any of them. This «failure» is subjectivity itself.
If you see a problem, write to us. Publisher, author, rights holder, or just a reader — it doesn't matter. If there's something problematic about copyright in this review, if the review's author has broken the site's rules, or if you simply have a suggestion or complaint, hey@kitabdanevar.com. We'd rather resolve this between ourselves than go to court: we review requests within 48 hours and, if needed, correct or fully remove the review.